Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete specific BARTOC entry #166

Closed
guitarster opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Delete specific BARTOC entry #166

guitarster opened this issue Mar 16, 2022 · 7 comments
Milestone

Comments

@guitarster
Copy link
Contributor

guitarster commented Mar 16, 2022

With the following search (https://bartoc.org/vocabularies?search=vorpommern) two entries of the same vocabulary are found. https://bartoc.org/en/node/1986 is the correct one and should be left.
https://bartoc.org/en/node/20398 is one entry too much and should be deleted.

Problem: at the moment, when deleting an entry, adding new entries works no more. This should be fixed before.

Further entries to delete;

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

Deleting vocabularies breaks creation of new vocabularies. Requires gbv/jskos-server#161.

@guitarster
Copy link
Contributor Author

see also #155

stefandesu added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2024
This will make deleting old records possible without issues.
@stefandesu
Copy link
Member

I adjusted the code for minting a new URI with the new feature in gbv/jskos-server#161. Deleting entries should now be possible without causing issues.

Note that when deleting the very latest record (i.e. currently highest ID), its URI will be reused for the next created record. Is that an issue @nichtich? If yes, we would need to save a counter somewhere...

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

Reuse of last record is fine.

@nichtich nichtich added this to the 1.3.0 milestone Oct 14, 2024
@stefandesu
Copy link
Member

Further entries to delete;

* [bartoc.org/en/node/18706](https://bartoc.org/en/node/18706) ([bartoc.org/en/node/20303](https://bartoc.org/en/node/20303) is the right one)

* [bartoc.org/en/node/20329](https://bartoc.org/en/node/20329) ([bartoc.org/en/node/20000](https://bartoc.org/en/node/20000) is the right one)

I just looked at these entries and they haven't been unified yet. Furthermore, I am personally not confident that these are really duplicates, especially in the second case. @nichtich Can you take a look?

bartoc.org/en/node/20398 is one entry too much and should be deleted.

I have deleted http://bartoc.org/en/node/20398.

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

@stefandesu
Copy link
Member

Done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants