Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add ACM CCS to Skosmos #185

Open
VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

add ACM CCS to Skosmos #185

VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link

VladimirAlexiev commented Jan 11, 2023

https://bartoc.org/en/node/475#access says that I can browse this vocab at
https://bartoc-skosmos.unibas.ch/CCS/, but that returns
404 Error: The page /CCS/ cannot be found.

Would it be possible to add this important thesaurus to Skosmos?
It's available in SKOS at https://dl.acm.org/pb-assets/dl_ccs/acm_ccs2012-1626988337597.xml (please add that link to the BARTOC record as well).

Thanks!

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Author

VladimirAlexiev commented Jan 11, 2023

Also:

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

Requires #186

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

The ACM CCS file is no valid RDF/XML (it can simply be fixed by changing lang to xml:lang) and it defines no base URI. At http://data.phdhub.eu/ there is a better version but I've found no data dump yet (data could be queried via SPARQL nevertheless). Shall we take this version?

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

nichtich commented Feb 17, 2023

So far I've found variants of ACM CCS at the following URI namespaces:

Namespace Source Year
http://oaff.info/ontology/acm-ccs# https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2011Jun/0018.html 2011
http://acm.rkbexplorer.com/ontologies/acm# https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/acm <=2011 (see archive.org)
https://vocabulary.semantic-web.com/acm/ https://vocabulary.semantic-web.com/acm/ ~2018
http://data.phdhub.eu/resource/classifications/ccs/ http://data.phdhub.eu/page/classifications/ccs ?
none https://dl.acm.org/pb-assets/dl_ccs/acm_ccs2012-1626988337597.xml >=2012

There may be reasons to mint new URIs for new editions of ACM CCS but these were not the reasons that lead to that many SKOS representations of the same classification. In my opinion ACM is to blame for not minting official URIs.

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Author

emailed [email protected]:
You provide the ACM CCS as RDF at
https://dl.acm.org/pb-assets/dl_ccs/acm_ccs2012-1626988337597.xml .
But the file has 2 defects:
(major) It doesn't define a base, which means the URLs are not well defined
(minor) It uses attribute "lang" instead of "xml:lang", which makes it invalid
Please see #185 for more details
(and we'll appreciate very much if you comment/contribute there).

Why is it important to have ACM CCS with stable semantic (RDF) URLs:
So that people can refer to these semantic resources in their own data.
So the data can be loaded to https://skosmos.bartoc.org/, which is a thesaurus integration platform
Thanks in advance!

@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Author

@nichtich thanks for the investigation! Emailed ACM, let's see.

I notice another difference:

More:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants