What noisy errors should Sentry filter out next? #72365
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
We are considering a solution in the JavaScript SDK which could help detect what might be noise from browser extensions, for example, and prevent this noise from appearing in the issues feed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We tend to get a ton of errors from third party initializations (like ad marketplaces) that end up flooding our logs. Curious if that qualifies, or if that is already handled in a way I haven't found yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We see a lot of errors for chrome extensions that I swear we used to be able to detect in the stack trace, seeing Here's a line from a chrome extension: (This should be ignored, but the
Here's a line from a piwik pro analytics container (hard to act on, but shouldn't be ignored):
Here's a line from our app code:
Here's a line from within next.js platform code: (Not clear why this isn't in
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not all errors are created equal - some point to critical problems in code while others are pure noise. We built Inbound Filters to automatically discard noisy errors, and hopefully make your Sentry experience more actionable.
Here's the current set of filters that Sentry provides out of the box:
Despite our best efforts to update this list of filters when we identify new errors, we know new ones crop up all the time and our lists aren't exhaustive.
This is where we'd like to ask for your help: what other errors should Sentry be filtering out? Please be as specific as possible, and link out to examples where possible.
We'll use the ideas we crowdsource to inform our next sets of updates. Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions