We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There a many examples (most Callbacks and other things) of the following differences between:
jsaddle-dom version:
jsaddle-dom
instance ToJSVal VoidCallback where toJSVal (VoidCallback (Callback r)) = toJSVal r
ghcjs-dom-jsffi version:
ghcjs-dom-jsffi
instance PToJSVal VoidCallback where pToJSVal (VoidCallback (Callback r)) = r
together with the missing in ghcjs-base
ghcjs-base
instance ToJsVal PToJSval where toJsVal = return . pToJsVal
this breaks code compatibility between GHC and GHCJS.
I am not sure which parts of the ecosystem should be fixed.
Should the above instance added to ghcjs-base?
Should one of ghcjs-dom-jsffi and jsaddle-dom be changed to make VoidCallback have the same instances in both?
VoidCallback
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
There a many examples (most Callbacks and other things) of the following differences between:
jsaddle-dom
version:ghcjs-dom-jsffi
version:together with the missing in
ghcjs-base
this breaks code compatibility between GHC and GHCJS.
I am not sure which parts of the ecosystem should be fixed.
Should the above instance added to
ghcjs-base
?Should one of
ghcjs-dom-jsffi
andjsaddle-dom
be changed to makeVoidCallback
have the same instances in both?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: