forked from JamesP6000/WsprryPi
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
nhash.h
197 lines (173 loc) · 9.27 KB
/
nhash.h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
/*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lookup3.c, by Bob Jenkins, May 2006, Public Domain.
These are functions for producing 32-bit hashes for hash table lookup.
hashword(), hashlittle(), hashlittle2(), hashbig(), mix(), and final()
are externally useful functions. Routines to test the hash are included
if SELF_TEST is defined. You can use this free for any purpose. It's in
the public domain. It has no warranty.
You probably want to use hashlittle(). hashlittle() and hashbig()
hash byte arrays. hashlittle() is is faster than hashbig() on
little-endian machines. Intel and AMD are little-endian machines.
On second thought, you probably want hashlittle2(), which is identical to
hashlittle() except it returns two 32-bit hashes for the price of one.
You could implement hashbig2() if you wanted but I haven't bothered here.
If you want to find a hash of, say, exactly 7 integers, do
a = i1; b = i2; c = i3;
mix(a,b,c);
a += i4; b += i5; c += i6;
mix(a,b,c);
a += i7;
final(a,b,c);
then use c as the hash value. If you have a variable length array of
4-byte integers to hash, use hashword(). If you have a byte array (like
a character string), use hashlittle(). If you have several byte arrays, or
a mix of things, see the comments above hashlittle().
Why is this so big? I read 12 bytes at a time into 3 4-byte integers,
then mix those integers. This is fast (you can do a lot more thorough
mixing with 12*3 instructions on 3 integers than you can with 3 instructions
on 1 byte), but shoehorning those bytes into integers efficiently is messy.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#ifndef _NHASH_H
#define _NHASH_H
#define SELF_TEST 1
#include <stdio.h> /* defines printf for tests */
#include <time.h> /* defines time_t for timings in the test */
#ifdef Win32
#include "win_stdint.h" /* defines uint32_t etc */
#else
#include <stdint.h> /* defines uint32_t etc */
#endif
//#include <sys/param.h> /* attempt to define endianness */
//#ifdef linux
//# include <endian.h> /* attempt to define endianness */
//#endif
#define HASH_LITTLE_ENDIAN 1
#define hashsize(n) ((uint32_t)1 << (n))
#define hashmask(n) (hashsize(n) - 1)
#define rot(x, k) (((x) << (k)) | ((x) >> (32 - (k))))
/*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mix -- mix 3 32-bit values reversibly.
This is reversible, so any information in (a,b,c) before mix() is
still in (a,b,c) after mix().
If four pairs of (a,b,c) inputs are run through mix(), or through
mix() in reverse, there are at least 32 bits of the output that
are sometimes the same for one pair and different for another pair.
This was tested for:
* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
(a,b,c).
* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
difference.
* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
Some k values for my "a-=c; a^=rot(c,k); c+=b;" arrangement that
satisfy this are
4 6 8 16 19 4
9 15 3 18 27 15
14 9 3 7 17 3
Well, "9 15 3 18 27 15" didn't quite get 32 bits diffing
for "differ" defined as + with a one-bit base and a two-bit delta. I
used http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/avalanche.html to choose
the operations, constants, and arrangements of the variables.
This does not achieve avalanche. There are input bits of (a,b,c)
that fail to affect some output bits of (a,b,c), especially of a. The
most thoroughly mixed value is c, but it doesn't really even achieve
avalanche in c.
This allows some parallelism. Read-after-writes are good at doubling
the number of bits affected, so the goal of mixing pulls in the opposite
direction as the goal of parallelism. I did what I could. Rotates
seem to cost as much as shifts on every machine I could lay my hands
on, and rotates are much kinder to the top and bottom bits, so I used
rotates.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#define mix(a, b, c) \
{ \
(a) -= (c); \
(a) ^= rot(c, 4); \
(c) += (b); \
(b) -= (a); \
(b) ^= rot(a, 6); \
(a) += (c); \
(c) -= (b); \
(c) ^= rot(b, 8); \
(b) += (a); \
(a) -= (c); \
(a) ^= rot(c, 16); \
(c) += (b); \
(b) -= (a); \
(b) ^= rot(a, 19); \
(a) += (c); \
(c) -= (b); \
(c) ^= rot(b, 4); \
(b) += (a); \
}
/*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
final -- final mixing of 3 32-bit values (a,b,c) into c
Pairs of (a,b,c) values differing in only a few bits will usually
produce values of c that look totally different. This was tested for
* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination
of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of
(a,b,c).
* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed
the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as
is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit
difference.
* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or
all zero plus a counter that starts at zero.
These constants passed:
14 11 25 16 4 14 24
12 14 25 16 4 14 24
and these came close:
4 8 15 26 3 22 24
10 8 15 26 3 22 24
11 8 15 26 3 22 24
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#define final(a, b, c) \
{ \
(c) ^= (b); \
(c) -= rot(b, 14); \
(a) ^= (c); \
(a) -= rot(c, 11); \
(b) ^= (a); \
(b) -= rot(a, 25); \
(c) ^= (b); \
(c) -= rot(b, 16); \
(a) ^= (c); \
(a) -= rot(c, 4); \
(b) ^= (a); \
(b) -= rot(a, 14); \
(c) ^= (b); \
(c) -= rot(b, 24); \
}
/*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hashlittle() -- hash a variable-length key into a 32-bit value
k : the key (the unaligned variable-length array of bytes)
length : the length of the key, counting by bytes
initval : can be any 4-byte value
Returns a 32-bit value. Every bit of the key affects every bit of
the return value. Two keys differing by one or two bits will have
totally different hash values.
The best hash table sizes are powers of 2. There is no need to do
mod a prime (mod is sooo slow!). If you need less than 32 bits,
use a bitmask. For example, if you need only 10 bits, do
h = (h & hashmask(10));
In which case, the hash table should have hashsize(10) elements.
If you are hashing n strings (uint8_t **)k, do it like this:
for (i=0, h=0; i<n; ++i) h = hashlittle( k[i], len[i], h);
By Bob Jenkins, 2006. [email protected]. You may use this
code any way you wish, private, educational, or commercial. It's free.
Use for hash table lookup, or anything where one collision in 2^^32 is
acceptable. Do NOT use for cryptographic purposes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
uint32_t nhash(const void *key, int length, uint32_t initval);
#endif