Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FUSE Read Only Snapshot #7

Open
segator opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 10 comments
Open

FUSE Read Only Snapshot #7

segator opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 10 comments

Comments

@segator
Copy link

segator commented Mar 31, 2016

It could be amazing if we can mount as a read only one snapshot as do btrfs but in read only.

or better even if we can mount all the snapshots and see the backup as a file versioning FS.

@ncw
Copy link

ncw commented Jul 20, 2017

restic does this and it is the killer feature IMHO! restic lets you mount all the snapshots - you see a dated directory for each one.

@gilbertchen
Copy link
Owner

This is in my plan but may take a while to get there.

@mathiasnagler
Copy link

Is there any update on this?

@TheBestPessimist
Copy link
Contributor

By this feature, you mean something like how time machine does the backups?

@christophetd
Copy link

christophetd commented Apr 12, 2018

@TheBestPessimist I believe it is more similar to a feature of restic that allows to mount a FUSE filesystem of any snapshot.

@windware-ono
Copy link

Is it difficult to implement?

@Phatzmillvit3019
Copy link

Phatzmillvit3019 commented Aug 21, 2018 via email

@Neurrone
Copy link

Just found this issue. This is the only missing feature that I'd love to have to adopt duplicacy for backups.

@SmArtKar
Copy link

SmArtKar commented May 7, 2022

I've made a draft PR with mounting backup, feedback is welcome
#628

@gilbertchen
Copy link
Owner

This issue has been mentioned on Duplicacy Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.duplicacy.com/t/restore-multiple-files-web-ui/5320/20

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants