-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FUSE Read Only Snapshot #7
Comments
restic does this and it is the killer feature IMHO! restic lets you mount all the snapshots - you see a dated directory for each one. |
This is in my plan but may take a while to get there. |
Is there any update on this? |
By this feature, you mean something like how time machine does the backups? |
@TheBestPessimist I believe it is more similar to a feature of restic that allows to mount a FUSE filesystem of any snapshot. |
Is it difficult to implement? |
Yes very much hard
…On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 2:30 PM Windware Solution LLC < ***@***.***> wrote:
Is it difficult to implement?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Akls6wK9AK8uLC8qQQ0IKyq5DhEH3DBJks5uRzYJgaJpZM4H8dqF>
.
|
Just found this issue. This is the only missing feature that I'd love to have to adopt duplicacy for backups. |
I've made a draft PR with mounting backup, feedback is welcome |
This issue has been mentioned on Duplicacy Forum. There might be relevant details there: https://forum.duplicacy.com/t/restore-multiple-files-web-ui/5320/20 |
It could be amazing if we can mount as a read only one snapshot as do btrfs but in read only.
or better even if we can mount all the snapshots and see the backup as a file versioning FS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: