You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is an extension of #1301, which #1512 implemented on a primitive level where the contents of the violation sequence aren't used at all.
It should be possible to interpret the violation sequence and refine our analysis accordingly. We should be able to kill some paths or refine some values based on that, a la (linear) observer automaton.
That would be more likely to reject some violation witnesses whose verdict might be correct, but the counterexample is obviously wrong.
Despite the YAML format trying to be less tied to internal representations, one big obstacle for us might be branching since CIL transformations introduce more conditionals. If we count branches incorrectly, we can become unsound. GraphML witness generation tried to do some un-CIL transformations, but those are probably incomplete.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is an extension of #1301, which #1512 implemented on a primitive level where the contents of the violation sequence aren't used at all.
It should be possible to interpret the violation sequence and refine our analysis accordingly. We should be able to kill some paths or refine some values based on that, a la (linear) observer automaton.
That would be more likely to reject some violation witnesses whose verdict might be correct, but the counterexample is obviously wrong.
Despite the YAML format trying to be less tied to internal representations, one big obstacle for us might be branching since CIL transformations introduce more conditionals. If we count branches incorrectly, we can become unsound. GraphML witness generation tried to do some un-CIL transformations, but those are probably incomplete.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: