You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is already a trait GlyphClosure defined for in GSUB, and I added glyph closure for cmap and glyf tables in #983, should we make the signatures match?
By a quick look, it seems that the glyph closure I added has a input unicodes set, and we compute transititve closure for glyphs in this set only, while the closure in current GSUB table computes all reachable glyphs in the whole table.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is already a trait
GlyphClosure
defined for in GSUB, and I added glyph closure for cmap and glyf tables in #983, should we make the signatures match?By a quick look, it seems that the glyph closure I added has a input unicodes set, and we compute transititve closure for glyphs in this set only, while the closure in current GSUB table computes all reachable glyphs in the whole table.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: