Rendering of historic=high_cross

[b-unicycling]

Expected behavior

It would be great if historic=high_cross could be rendered in some way, the easiest would be, if they were rendered like historic=wayside_cross.
More than half are National Monuments; it would be useful to have those shown on the map.

Actual behavior

Not rendered at all, because the tag didn't go through proposal process.

Screenshots with links illustrating the problem

[Sirorezka]

I agree, noticed same issue. Some historic objects and especially points are not rendered at all. One more example:

Link:
map_link

Screenshots:

[imagico]

Thanks for the suggestion. historic=high_cross currently has 56 uses, almost all of them in Ireland, almost all of them added in the last 6 months. So too little basis so far to assess if the tag is sufficiently accepted by mappers and consistently used with a well defined meaning.

It is somewhat odd that given that

• we render man_made=cross
• man_made=cross would by most be considered valid tagging for the features in question
• tagging man_made=cross would not collide with historic=high_cross in any way

hardly any of the 56 use cases are tagged man_made=cross.

And to be clear - proposal processes have very little bearing on if or not we render a tag.

@Sirorezka - different issue - see #331.

Closing this for the moment because lack of sustained broader use so far makes proper assessment impossible. This does not in any way prejudice a later assessment based on a better data basis.