Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ERROR: no matching manifest for linux/arm/v8 in the manifest list entries #39

Open
robotrapta opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #40
Open

ERROR: no matching manifest for linux/arm/v8 in the manifest list entries #39

robotrapta opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #40

Comments

@robotrapta
Copy link
Member

This issue can come up when running docker-compose up and it tries to pull docker.io/groundlight/monitoring-notification-server-backend:latest from dockerhub.

@robotrapta
Copy link
Member Author

linux/arm/v8 is not a supported tag at https://hub.docker.com/r/groundlight/monitoring-notification-server-backend/tags.

We should probably add it as a supported tag, but AFAICT it's only requested in somewhat strange situations. Specifically we've seen this on a machine with 64-bit hardware, and a 64-bit kernel (as shown by uname -m returning aarch64, but 32-bit userland processes. e.g. file /usr/bin/docker returning ELF 32-bit. This indicates the OS is a bit of a strange 32-bit/64-bit hybrid.

ARM chips which support the v8 instruction set are necessarily 64-bit capable. By asking for arm/v8 it seems to be asking for a 32-bit version of the image, but using the v8 instruction set which generally runs at 64 bit.

For these reasons, we currently advise fixing the OS / docker installation to use linux/arm64 images. But we'll leave this open until we properly support this scenario, because it's not crazy to think somebody would have good reason to want arm/v8.

@robotrapta robotrapta linked a pull request Dec 7, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant