Discussion about CLIs #52
joaomcteixeira
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
No preference from my side; apply rule 1 🙂 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently HADDOCK3 has a single command-line interface:
haddock3, added after #28However, after #43 I foresee that more CLIs will be needed. Personally, I like the idea of having all functionalities in well structured CLIs instead of separate scripts inside the repository. Yet, the CLI for #42 and #43 is not a user related CLI, it is more of a developer related CLI.
What about we have two main haddoc3 structured CLIs?:
haddock3haddock3-devIn the future, CLIs related to structural biology would be placed under
haddock3and tools related to aid development could be placed underhaddock3-dev. For example, #43 could be under:haddock3-dev cnstreeIn this way the CLI could easily have integrated docs.
It is a bit wordy, but helps converging everything to a single point.
I am still brainstorming this idea, comments are welcomed.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions