You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When setting a repository to Public under Gitness (which is described as "Anyone with access to the Gitness environment can clone this repo"), browsing the repository via the Web UI is not possible, however, unauthenticated git pulls are.
Personally, I'd be fine if Public on Gitness meant what Protected/Internal means everywhere else (if you can log in to Gitness, you can see and work with the repo), but this is a weird combination of both Public as in "everyone in the world" (can git pull), and Public as in "everyone with an account" (can see the repo in their browser)...
Is this a bug, or is this intended behaviour? It might be worthwhile to clarify the note on the visibility level if this is intended - point out that you don't need an account to do a pull.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is due to incremental development / shipping subsets of features as soon as they are ready. The backend team added support for public clone because it was relatively simple. However, the effort to update the frontend to support unauthenticated / guest browsing of public repositories is a much larger effort. These frontend changes are a separate workstream and have not been pushed yet.
When setting a repository to Public under Gitness (which is described as "Anyone with access to the Gitness environment can clone this repo"), browsing the repository via the Web UI is not possible, however, unauthenticated git pulls are.
Personally, I'd be fine if Public on Gitness meant what Protected/Internal means everywhere else (if you can log in to Gitness, you can see and work with the repo), but this is a weird combination of both Public as in "everyone in the world" (can git pull), and Public as in "everyone with an account" (can see the repo in their browser)...
Is this a bug, or is this intended behaviour? It might be worthwhile to clarify the note on the visibility level if this is intended - point out that you don't need an account to do a pull.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: