Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Integrate a release automation tool into the scaffolding release workflow #391

Open
c12i opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@c12i
Copy link
Collaborator

c12i commented Oct 9, 2024

Introduce release-plz or any other release automation tool into the release workflow. As well as keeping a changelog which will require enforcing conventional commits

@c12i c12i self-assigned this Oct 9, 2024
@c12i c12i added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 9, 2024
@c12i c12i transferred this issue from holochain/Components Oct 15, 2024
@ThetaSinner
Copy link
Member

Just an FYI that there's a spike in the Holochain repo to investigate some release tooling options. This is one is one of the options but it'd be super if we converged on a single piece of tooling so we don't have to keep thinking about different tooling each time we go to a different repo. If we experiment with some tools before we converge that is also fine with me :)

@c12i c12i changed the title feat: Integrate release_plz into the scaffolding release workflow feat: Integrate a release tool into the scaffolding release workflow Oct 22, 2024
@c12i c12i changed the title feat: Integrate a release tool into the scaffolding release workflow feat: Integrate a release automation tool into the scaffolding release workflow Oct 22, 2024
@c12i
Copy link
Collaborator Author

c12i commented Oct 22, 2024

Yes, makes sense to use consistent release automation tooling. I suppose this is the issue you are currently using to track this? holochain/wind-tunnel#116

@ThetaSinner
Copy link
Member

That's part of it yes, where we think that doing changelogs without custom tooling is likely going to work nicely with conventional commits. Hopefully a release tool would also use that. But the issue against the Holochain repo is this one holochain/holochain#4355. Not much detail yet, but the plan we've discussed verbally is to do a spike on tooling at some point

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants