You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I start this snippet, I have then to go manually normal mode to get out of the tag. Luckily, UltiSnips' snippet take precendence, and it uses the tabstop number 1 instead of 0, which gets defaulted to after-the-snippet:
I'm specifically referring to HTML snippets, but I guess other language's snippet files are similar.
Take this
vim-snippets/snippets/html.snippets
Lines 179 to 180 in faaa499
If I start this snippet, I have then to go manually normal mode to get out of the tag. Luckily, UltiSnips' snippet take precendence, and it uses the tabstop number 1 instead of 0, which gets defaulted to after-the-snippet:
vim-snippets/UltiSnips/html.snippets
Lines 90 to 92 in faaa499
Unfortunately, not all snippets are like that. The snippet for
<p>
, for instance, uses the 0th tabstop in both collections:vim-snippets/snippets/html.snippets
Lines 682 to 683 in faaa499
vim-snippets/UltiSnips/html.snippets
Lines 388 to 390 in faaa499
Is it ok if I make a PR for
snippets/html.snippets
andUltiSnips/html.snippets
change all those0
s to1
s?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: