move the GMP cost model code into its own library

[cartazio]

This would make cabal repl work, and its independently interesting code. Also should be super stable code.

@bts thoughts?

[bts]

i think this could make sense a little further down the line, but we should focus on hopping the language forward at the moment

[cartazio]

Another fix would be to set fobject code in the GHC options clause of the
cabal file. I'll see if that works
On Apr 21, 2016 11:33 AM, "Brian Schroeder" [email protected]
wrote:

i think this could make sense a little further down the line, but we
should focus on hopping forward at the moment

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/hopper-lang/hopper/issues/15#issuecomment-212976103

[cartazio]

I like the pun btw, forgot to mention that. :)