Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

loadbalancer labels vs. types #3

Open
wilreichert opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

loadbalancer labels vs. types #3

wilreichert opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@wilreichert
Copy link

Is there a reason why you chose to leverage a ConfigMap containing a app: loadbalancer label instead of using the typical type: LoadBalancer definition on a Service?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wilreichert