-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CONNECT and tunnel support #164
Comments
Gentle ping ... any feedback from a maintainer would be great. |
I don't know what the status is. Does it not "just work" right now? Anything in the spec we likely want to support. If you want to try to figure out what is needed, you're welcome to! I don't know if any of the others have the time to focus on this, though. |
@seanmonstar ah got it. I think we were just assuming there were missing pieces since it was still listed in the roadmap |
It certainly could be, I haven't checked at all. I've already forgotten what even is required. If it's similar to HTTP/2 CONNECT, then we probably need some work done. |
From the proposal:
Curious what the status is? If nobody is working on this I'd be happy to contribute although I might need a bit of guidance.
Guidance mostly around the expected API surface. Currently inspecting
h2
as a reference.The client TCP connection and probably server TCP connection would be managed by the application/proxy that depends on
h3
(at least for the usecases I have in mind). Is there desire to handle that forwarding in h3? I assume not.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: