Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[documentation] Practical documentation on metadata and store assets #337

Closed
6r1d opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

[documentation] Practical documentation on metadata and store assets #337

6r1d opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@6r1d
Copy link
Contributor

6r1d commented May 8, 2023

A copy of hyperledger-iroha/iroha#3456 by @v-a-net


Documentation URL(s)

https://hyperledger.github.io/iroha-2-docs/guide/configure/metadata-and-store-assets.html
https://hyperledger.github.io/iroha-2-docs/guide/blockchain/metadata.html

Description

Iroha 1 provides an easy way to store metadata in user account. This feature was super useful to use Iroha as a data ledger rather than just using fungible assets.

Iroha 2 seems to keep this super feature and even extends it with metadata and store assets (https://hyperledger.github.io/iroha-2-docs/guide/configure/metadata-and-store-assets.html).

Your suggestions

Could you provide a more detailed documentation (especially client usage in rust and with the bash client if it's implemented yet) about how practically using metadata and store assets for iroha 2 ?

Who can help?

No response

@6r1d
Copy link
Contributor Author

6r1d commented May 8, 2023

This feature was super useful for using Iroha as a data ledger rather than just using fungible assets.

Well, let's imagine its internal behaviour. Both Store and metadata would have separate records in the blockchain for every update. Given that, you can only get more fields than you need with Metadata.

In that case, does it mean only a question of API usability remains here?

@v-a-net
Copy link

v-a-net commented May 8, 2023

I think so! From my understanding of the current implementation, I think that the tutorial documentation mainly lacks practical details and examples about this topic. This was the main reason of this issue.

@nxsaken
Copy link
Contributor

nxsaken commented May 20, 2024

Superseded by #450 and #451.

@nxsaken nxsaken closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants