Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Configurable strategy for minting URIs #238

Open
tpluscode opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Configurable strategy for minting URIs #238

tpluscode opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@tpluscode
Copy link
Member

I would add an options{} object to the default function and put this function as an optional parameter.

Just in case one doesn't want to use nanoid() to mint URIs (for use, for example, use incremental integers instead).

The default would be nanoid()

Originally posted by @cristianvasquez in #236 (comment)
@tpluscode tpluscode changed the title Configurable strategy fir minting URIs Configurable strategy for minting URIs Sep 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tpluscode