Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request : Add estimated Wind Speed and Direction as logic condition flight parameters #10372

Open
rts18 opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@rts18
Copy link

rts18 commented Sep 19, 2024

Desired Behavior

After talking with @b14ckyy about the matter of fixedwing auto landing and wind speed effecting the landing position. I was thinking it would be helpful to have the estimated wind direction and estimated wind speed added as flight parameters to the programming tab.

Who does this impact? Who is this for?

I believe this would help people to perhaps find a work-around to the aforementioned issue using the programming tab. Until a proper fix can be implemented at a later date.

Thanks for your consideration.

@b14ckyy
Copy link
Collaborator

b14ckyy commented Sep 20, 2024

In general I am always keen to see additional values usable for programming but I am curious, what you want to do with these values specifically.

@rts18
Copy link
Author

rts18 commented Sep 20, 2024

I had an idea of using the estimated wind speed and direction, if applicable to the approach heading; to drive timer based throttle or elevator override conditions. To either push the nose down a little at select distances from the landing location. And add or subtract a small amount of throttle, based on the headwind and current altitude at a given position on the approach. Being permitted by setting nav_override_motor_stop = off or off_always

Don't shoot me for a theory. It would require some testing to see if the idea has merit; and it may not work.
But considering wind speed and direction has such a strong influence on fixedwing flight. I thought the addition of these flight logic parameters would be useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants