From 49ed004b5648a1d29baaa8bb65cc9853fbe3a28b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ID Bot Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:41:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Script updating archive at 2024-12-12T00:41:01Z. [ci skip] --- archive.json | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/archive.json b/archive.json index 38fd798..14c5f39 100644 --- a/archive.json +++ b/archive.json @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { "magic": "E!vIA5L86J2I", - "timestamp": "2024-12-10T00:41:44.950960+00:00", + "timestamp": "2024-12-12T00:40:56.956817+00:00", "repo": "ietf-wg-scitt/draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi", "labels": [ { @@ -3326,13 +3326,13 @@ "labels": [], "body": "Addresses #10 , #12 , #13 , #14 , #20 and #22 \r\n\r\nCleans up async workflow\r\nCleans up async error reporting\r\nCleans up locators\r\nMore defined/single responsibilities for endpoint calls and returns", "createdAt": "2024-12-03T16:20:49Z", - "updatedAt": "2024-12-06T10:12:48Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:24:16Z", "baseRepository": "ietf-wg-scitt/draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi", "baseRefName": "main", "baseRefOid": "e7751b5ed12e9a310632e616a9a505adfdadff41", "headRepository": "ietf-wg-scitt/draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi", "headRefName": "jag-uk/23-async-operations-locators", - "headRefOid": "7e934bdee644f4952bd897bb14bd74c2a88cd6a6", + "headRefOid": "166bbbeecc166e573cc6e2eecb5355a968f742b2", "closedAt": null, "mergedAt": null, "mergedBy": null, @@ -3619,6 +3619,86 @@ "createdAt": "2024-12-06T10:12:48Z", "updatedAt": "2024-12-06T10:12:48Z", "comments": [] + }, + { + "id": "PRR_kwDOLJjbks6UkxnO", + "commit": { + "abbreviatedOid": "7e934bd" + }, + "author": "JAG-UK", + "authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR", + "state": "COMMENTED", + "body": "", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:16:19Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:16:19Z", + "comments": [ + { + "originalPosition": 307, + "body": "Yes I'm expecting to merge this first, then yours, and the authentication statements will magically evaporate :-)\r\n", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:16:19Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:16:19Z" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "PRR_kwDOLJjbks6UkzDT", + "commit": { + "abbreviatedOid": "7e934bd" + }, + "author": "achamayou", + "authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR", + "state": "COMMENTED", + "body": "", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:18:08Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:18:09Z", + "comments": [ + { + "originalPosition": 307, + "body": "Sounds great, let's merge?", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:18:08Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:18:09Z" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "PRR_kwDOLJjbks6Ukz5C", + "commit": { + "abbreviatedOid": "7e934bd" + }, + "author": "JAG-UK", + "authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR", + "state": "COMMENTED", + "body": "", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:19:03Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:19:03Z", + "comments": [ + { + "originalPosition": 352, + "body": "There's certainly a whiff of redundancy. I kept the `response-code` in because (unfortunately, but perhaps to some advantage) CoAP codes are slightly different to HTTP codes. \r\n\r\nI like `instance` because it offers a chance for richer machine-driven interpretation of errors, which feels useful given that our early implementers seem to be using things like no-code builders and GitHub actions for their environment. ", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:19:03Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:19:03Z" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "PRR_kwDOLJjbks6Uk32N", + "commit": { + "abbreviatedOid": "7e934bd" + }, + "author": "JAG-UK", + "authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR", + "state": "COMMENTED", + "body": "", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:24:16Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:24:16Z", + "comments": [ + { + "originalPosition": 40, + "body": "Update pushed", + "createdAt": "2024-12-10T15:24:16Z", + "updatedAt": "2024-12-10T15:24:16Z" + } + ] } ] },