You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After the SXR inversion we get a symmetric density and an asymmetry profile. Using the toroidal rotation from CXRS we can get the predicted asymmetry profiles for the two species. Therefore the asymmetry parameter should give us the ratios of the two species and the density profile will give us an absolute magnitude. We can likely use an optimization routine to find the symmetric density profile for mid-Z and high-Z.
Implementation
factor out reused functionality from invert_radiation
allow fixing asymmetry parameter for invert_radiation
reconstruct density rather than emissivity
pass in loss function and electron density to invert call
write closure for init_guess_bounds that returns densities
write closure for emissivity_from_knotvals that converts densities to EmissivityProfiles
asym_profile + asym_profile != asym_profile => problem
allow reconstruction of multiple elements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Principle
After the SXR inversion we get a symmetric density and an asymmetry profile. Using the toroidal rotation from CXRS we can get the predicted asymmetry profiles for the two species. Therefore the asymmetry parameter should give us the ratios of the two species and the density profile will give us an absolute magnitude. We can likely use an optimization routine to find the symmetric density profile for mid-Z and high-Z.
Implementation
emissivity_from_knotvals
that converts densities toEmissivityProfile
sThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: