Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
That's because we prioritize zero-configuration higher than optimization. CSS transform can be faster in some situation. However it create a new stacking context which changes the behavior of overflowed element (ex. bvaughn/react-virtualized#122). So we don't use it, at least as default. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hmm, didn't know about that. Is there a way to switch to using transform, or do I need to create my own component wrapper for the core package? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It's generally more performant to use
transform
, because it can be GPU accelerated and avoids layout recalculations.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions