Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please consider fixing issues detected by repository checker #68

Closed
7 tasks
ioBroker-Bot opened this issue Oct 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
7 tasks

Please consider fixing issues detected by repository checker #68

ioBroker-Bot opened this issue Oct 20, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@ioBroker-Bot
Copy link

Notification from ioBroker Check and Service Bot

Dear adapter developer,

I'm the ioBroker Check and Service Bot. I'm an automated tool processing routine tasks for the ioBroker infrastructure. I have recently checked the repository for your adapter alias-manager for common errors and appropiate suggestions to keep this adapter up to date.

This check is based the current head revisions (master / main branch) of the adapter repository

Please see the result of the check below.

ioBroker.alias-manager

Downloads Number of Installations (latest) Number of Installations (stable) - Test and Release

👍 No errors found

WARNINGS:

  • 👀 [W127] Missing suggested translation into uk of "common.titleLang" in io-package.json.
  • 👀 [W134] Missing suggested translation into uk of "common.desc" in io-package.json.
  • 👀 [W154] Missing suggested translation into uk of some "common.news" in io-package.json.
  • 👀 [W184] "common.materializeTab" is deprecated for admin >= 5 at io-package.json. Please use property "adminUI".
  • 👀 [W513] "gulpfile.js" found in repo! Think about migrating to @iobroker/adapter-dev package
  • 👀 [W953] .npmignore found - consider using package.json object "files" instead.

SUGGESTIONS:

  • 📌 [S522] Please consider migrating to admin 5 UI (jsonConfig).

Please review issues reported and consider fixing them as soon as appropiate.

Warnings reported by repository checker should be reviewed. While some warnings can be ignored due to good reasons or a dedicated decision of the developer, most warnings should be fixed as soon as appropiate.

Suggestions reported by repository checker should be reviewed. Suggestions can be ignored due to a decision of the developer but they are reported as a hint to use a configuration which might get required in future or at least is used be most adapters. Suggestions are always optional to follow.

You may start a new check or force the creation of a new issue at any time by adding the following comment to this issue:

@iobroker-bot recheck
or
@iobroker-bot recreate

Please note that I (and the server at GitHub) have always plenty of work to do. So it may last up to 30 minutes until you see a reaction. I will drop a comment here as soon as I start processing.

Feel free to contact me (@ioBroker-Bot) if you have any questions or feel that an issue is incorrectly flagged.

And THANKS A LOT for maintaining this adapter from me and all users.
Let's work together for the best user experience.

your
ioBroker Check and Service Bot

Note: This issue replaces issue #54

@mcm1957 for evidence

Last update at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 08:13:09 GMT based on commit cfb05bf
ioBroker.repochecker 3.1.3

@mcm1957
Copy link
Member

mcm1957 commented Oct 20, 2024

@ioBroker-Bot recreate

@ioBroker-Bot
Copy link
Author

Thanks for contacting me.
I received your request to recheck this repository and to recreate the checker issue. I will start doing my work soon.
I will close an existing issue and create a new one if any issues are to be reported.

Thanks for spending your time and working at an ioBroker adapter.

your
ioBroker Check and Service Bot

@ioBroker-Bot
Copy link
Author

Issue outdated due to RECREATE request. Follow up issue #71 has been created.
This issue will be closed.

your
ioBroker Check and Service Bot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants