Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Review optional endpoints like monitoring and wireless #144

Open
roesekoSICKAG opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Review optional endpoints like monitoring and wireless #144

roesekoSICKAG opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@roesekoSICKAG

Comments

@roesekoSICKAG
Copy link
Collaborator

Wireless, monitoring endpoints need to be optional.
Error codes "Operation not supported" needs to be added as well.

Review all endpoint descriptions if endpoint is optional or not and extend description respectively.
@roesekoSICKAG
Copy link
Collaborator Author

roesekoSICKAG commented Oct 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Maybe it makes sense to have the vendor and device id available in the port status also for none wireless devices.
image

@roesekoSICKAG
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discussion in WG meeting (14/10/2024):
The endpoints for optional features like IODD, MQTT, monitoring and wireless extensions shall have a common description as following:
"This endpoint is mandatory if the gateway/master/port supports the ... feature."

@roesekoSICKAG roesekoSICKAG self-assigned this Oct 14, 2024
@roesekoSICKAG roesekoSICKAG mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@roesekoSICKAG roesekoSICKAG

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

fix/144-review-optional-endpoints iolinkcommunity/JSON_for_IO-Link
1 participant
@roesekoSICKAG