We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Here are the DPJ benchmarks:
https://github.com/dpj/DPJ/tree/master/Benchmarks
When they do reductions they use a "commutaitve" keyword as a programmer assertion. For instance here and here.
We can use this in an evaluation section -- "what would it take to make all the DPJ examples fully safe, rather than trusting the programmer?".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Here are the DPJ benchmarks:
https://github.com/dpj/DPJ/tree/master/Benchmarks
When they do reductions they use a "commutaitve" keyword as a programmer assertion. For instance here and here.
We can use this in an evaluation section -- "what would it take to make all the DPJ examples fully safe, rather than trusting the programmer?".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: