setup discussion platform #329
Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
The old mailing list does exist though. But we do need to move out. Other alternatives apart from what you mentioned:
I'm not fond of and very unlikely to participate in:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm also unlikely to participate in anything that produces sounds or has a similar interface or interaction model to IRC (like slack), or that requires constant monitoring to participate. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm unlikely to participate on Reddit, IRC, Slack etc. either for the same reasons.
Oh, didn't know that. Well, that sounds like the way forward? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We can try it. We just need to be aware that if we ever move out of github, those may not port over. (Although, if I'm not mistaken, they use the same implementation as the issues.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is it. Now we have a discussion platform. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'd really like a discussion platform for Dunai and Yampa which is open and accessible.
The old mailing list is no longer visible (and was archaic). Some platform are proprietary and closed, with no access to the raw data (Discord, Reddit). Classic forums and web boards require hosting, setup and maintenance (phpBB).
A recurring scheme I've seen with some smaller projects is to setup an additional repository "project-discuss" where issues are misused for open discussion without spamming the original issues. Anyone cloning the repo is likely already registered on github.
Another way would be to make the
yampa
tag on Stackoverflow more visible in the readme. With the potential downside that some discussions could get lost due to missing or wrong tags ("should I use dunai bearriver or yampa or haskell+FRP?").What are your opinions?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions