Is there anyway to set JOOR to create a test directory under \target ?

[cvgaviao]

I'm trying to create an annotation processor class and started to use JOOR to test it.

    @Test
    public void ensureAnnotationProcessorCreatesResourceBundleClassAndPropertiesWithMultipleLocales() throws Exception {
        MessageBundleGeneratorAnnotationProcessor processor = new MessageBundleGeneratorAnnotationProcessor();
        Reflect.compile(
                "br.com.c8tech.javalib.apt.i18n.SourceResourceBundleWithTwoMethods",
                "package br.com.c8tech.javalib.apt.i18n; "
                        + "@MessageBundle "
                        + "public interface SourceResourceBundleWithTwoMethods {"
                        + "@Message(value=\" worked {0} ! \", locale=\"pt-BR\" )"
                        + " public String m1(String pZero);" 
                        + "@Message(\" worked {0} {1}! \")"
                        + " public String m2(String pZero, String pOne);" 
                        + "}",
                        new CompileOptions().options("-source", "8")
                        .processors(processor))
        .type();
        assertTrue(processor.isProcessed());
    }

In the class under test I'm creating a resource file:

FileObject f = processingEnv.getFiler().createResource(
                    StandardLocation.SOURCE_OUTPUT, "", resourceName);
            

I'm running the test inside Eclipse IDE and I was expecting that the resulting files was being created inside a specific test directory under project's \target directory, but it is being created inside my annotation processor project's directory instead.

Am I missing something ?

[lukaseder]

Not sure what could be missing here. Would you mind creating a complete test case so we can reproduce it?

[cvgaviao]

Not sure what could be missing here. Would you mind creating a complete test case so we can reproduce it?

Hi @lukaseder, thanks for your time.

I've pushed an initial code of my annotation processor project to github: https://github.com/cvgaviao/c8tech-jlib-i18n/blob/master/c8tech-jlib-i18n-apt/src/test/java/br/com/c8tech/jlib/i18n/apt/MessageBundleAnnotationProcessorTest.java

Note that when running this test the resulting artifacts are being created inside the c8tech-jlib-i18n-apt/ directory.

[lukaseder]

I see, so the processor is here: https://github.com/cvgaviao/c8tech-jlib-i18n/blob/c9b1b11ddd74f767be2b1f72f04fa7b62ae8c92b/c8tech-jlib-i18n-apt/src/main/java/br/com/c8tech/jlib/i18n/apt/MessageBundleGeneratorAnnotationProcessor.java, for the record.

Have you tried specifying the -s option in your CompileOptions?

[cvgaviao]

Have you tried specifying the -s option in your CompileOptions?

Wow, this is it !!!
I've passed too many years running tests with maven/eclipse and I never noted that they provide that -s to the compiler :( .

As I'm using Junit5, I've created a simple extension that creates and injects the method test's directory into a Path method parameter. So the developer just need to use it to set the -soption.

I'll will commit and post the link here soon. Perhaps others need it too.

thanks !

[cvgaviao]

@lukaseder, one more question:

Do I need to set any parameter in order to see the messages provided to processingEnv.getMessager().printMessage() method?

[cvgaviao]

Have you tried specifying the -s option in your CompileOptions?

Well, actually the use of -s do not resolved my problem. It was partially resolved by using -d.

When generating resource files using processingEnv.getFiler().createResource. The resource are correctly created in the directory passed to -doption.

But unfortunately, neither -s or -d is working when generating source files using processingEnv.getFiler().createSourceFile.

Somehow the calculated directory being used is something like this: org.joor.Compile$JavaFileObject[string:///br/com/c8tech/jlib/i18n/apt/SourceResourceBundleWithTwoMethodsAndMultipleLocalesImpl.java]

[lukaseder]

Do I need to set any parameter in order to see the messages provided to processingEnv.getMessager().printMessage() method?

I guess that's currently not possible yet. The output appears in the exception in case of a compilation error, but not in case of the happy path. I've created a feature request for this: #88