Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Compatibility certification request for v3.0.4 of Jakarta SOAP with Attachments Implementation #135

Open
10 tasks done
lukasj opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
10 tasks done

Compatibility certification request for v3.0.4 of Jakarta SOAP with Attachments Implementation #135

lukasj opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
certification

Comments

@lukasj
Copy link
Contributor

lukasj commented May 13, 2024

  • Organization Name ("Organization") and, if applicable, URL:
    Eclipse Foundation
  • Product Name, Version and download URL (if applicable):
    Eclipse Implementation of Jakarta SOAP with Attachments 3.0.4
  • Specification Name, Version and download URL:
    Jakarta SOAP with Attachments 3.0
  • TCK Version, digital SHA-256 fingerprint and download URL:
    Jakarta SOAP with Attachments TCK 3.0.0, SHA-256: bf28edb7d2db10757fab79a3b6ded2931dfbe78066bd7359b690c8977c8d0eb7
  • Public URL of TCK Results Summary:
    TCK results summary
  • Any Additional Specification Certification Requirements:
    None
  • Java runtime used to run the implementation:
    Oracle JDK 17.0.2, Oracle JDK 21.0.2
  • Summary of the information for the certification environment, operating system, cloud, ...:
    Linux
  • By checking this box I acknowledge that the Organization I represent accepts the terms of the EFTL.
  • By checking this box I attest that all TCK requirements have been met, including any compatibility rules.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
certification
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lukasj