Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Selection of c, c1 and c2 in the PSO implementation for IntegerParameters #120

Open
reedts opened this issue Sep 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@reedts
Copy link

reedts commented Sep 25, 2018

Hey all,
working on my implementation of the PSO for an Auto-Tuning-Framework, I was wondering what the implementation of the PSO in OpenTuner is based on?

If I understand your implementation correctly, you're using weights c, c1 and c2 which are all equal to 0.5 scaled by a random float between 0.0 and 1.0. However what I found in theoretical references (e.g. Eberhart and Shi "Tracking and optimizing dynamic systems with particle swarms.") as a good choice for the weights was U(0,1) or even the use of a constricting coefficient instead of weights.

Is there a specific reason you decided to implement the PSO the way it currently is?

Cheers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant