Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v2.0 checklist #1841

Closed
4 of 8 tasks
akre54 opened this issue Sep 9, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed
4 of 8 tasks

v2.0 checklist #1841

akre54 opened this issue Sep 9, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@akre54
Copy link
Collaborator

akre54 commented Sep 9, 2014

Following 1.7.1, here's a list of things that would be great to get into v2.0. @megawac @braddunbar @michaelficarra let me know if I've missed something.

@megawac
Copy link
Collaborator

megawac commented Sep 9, 2014

@akre54
Copy link
Collaborator Author

akre54 commented Sep 9, 2014

solve how comparitors are handled #1768

Got this one already ;)

add forIn and keysIn (keysIn should respect #1781) #1590 (useful internally as well)

:meh:

Sparse arrays in keys? #1614

Sparse arrays in keys shouldn't be necessary because keys is strictly an Objects method and we've killed sparse array support everywhere else.

I'll keep the list updated with your other suggestions.

@jdalton
Copy link
Contributor

jdalton commented Sep 9, 2014

Sparse arrays in keys shouldn't be necessary because keys is strictly an Objects method and we've killed sparse array support everywhere else.

It flows into consistency, treating sparse arrays as dense, and can roll into other arguments object bug fixes that _.keys could handle.

Other "Objects" methods treat sparse arrays as dense like _.clone (once _.slice lands) and _.isEqual.

@akre54
Copy link
Collaborator Author

akre54 commented Sep 9, 2014

Let's move this discussion to that thread.

@jgonggrijp
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing because this is very outdated and lists of issues are more conveniently managed with a milestone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants