Jasmine 2.0

[noelrappin]

The Jasmine 2.0 branch is well behind, and doesn't seem to match the new Jasmine boot structure. Are there plans to update to Jasmine 2.0, do you need somebody to work on it?

[jejacks0n]

Well, this is going to be tough.. at least from my initial spike on it.

The problem is basically that the architecture was mostly written for Jasmine 1, and I adapted that for Mocha and QUnit.. but Jasmine 2 doesn't fit into it as well -- and @jcoglan had some feedback about it being too coupled. I'm sort of lost with a better way to do it, that's not coupled, and so would love comments about how we could make that better -- and easier to do this sort of thing in the future.

So, I think we need a conversation about ideas on how to do this, how to make it better, and then we can probably move forward with whatever ideas we can come up with.

I'll provide more information if it's worthwhile.

[thansber]

From the documentation it looks like Jasmine 2.0.0 is supported but this issue makes me think it is not. I have not been able to get Jasmine 2.0.0 working locally and just wanted to check if I am wasting my time.

[jejacks0n]

You are. I haven't finished it.

---

Jeremy Jackson

On Apr 23, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Todd Hansberger [email protected] wrote:

From the documentation it looks like Jasmine 2.0.0 is supported but this issue makes me think it is not. I have not been able to get Jasmine 2.0.0 working locally and just wanted to check if I am wasting my time.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[michael-harrison]

@jejacks0n will be happy to help in my somewhat limited free time :) I've just done a pull request for jasminerice (bradphelan/jasminerice#124) however I can see that this picking up where jasminerice left off.

[mikepack]

Closing. On the roadmap for 1.0. Would gladly accept a PR.

[mikepack]

1.0 has been released and support for Jasmine 2 has been added.