[Missing Doc] IPv6 description (new Config)

[DoM1niC]

What is the best way to allow IPv6 mixed with NATed Network with IPv4

My Jitsi Web assigned a own IPv6 now and I want to use the Bridge native with IPv6 Clients now....
Both the Web and the Videobridge have different IPv6 IPs.

STUN have assigned a IPv6 too the same in my case like the Videobridge....

IPv4 use the same one external IP, this already works fine.

My question is now, is this Config already fine to work with IPv6 I test a bit around and a listener is now open ... @bgrozev

Netstat
udp6 7296 0 2a02:8106:xxx:xxx:10000 :::*

this is my current Snipp of my Network Stuff
so all would be work with my Example ?

  harvest {
    use-ipv6 = true
    use-link-local-addresses = false
    timeout = 15 seconds

    udp {
      receive-buffer-size = 10485760
      use-dynamic-ports = false
    }

    // Configuration for the set of "mapping" harvesters.
    mapping {
      aws {
        enabled = false
        force = false
      }
      stun {
        addresses = [ "turn.3dns.eu:3478" ]
      }
      static-mappings = [
        {
            local-address = "10.10.x.x"
            public-address = "24.134.x.x"
        }
      ]
    }
  }

[bgrozev]

so all would be work with my Example ?

I don't see why not. You can set org.jitsi.videobridge.xmpp.XmppConnection.level=ALL in /etc/jitsi/videobridge/logging.properties, then grep for "SENT" in the logs to see the candidates that the bridge sent.

[DoM1niC]

So far all works fine I disable IPv4 and forced v6 in my test, xmpp is in the same private network, this should be fine for me.. 😊

my Example seems to work, but I wonder the STUN is really needed for my environment?

I have a coturn ready but jitsi use it for P2P, but not by Videobridge so it's not necessary?