This README provides instructions on how to run vLLM with Intel Gaudi devices.
Please follow the instructions provided in the Gaudi Installation Guide to set up the execution environment. To achieve the best performance, please follow the methods outlined in the Optimizing Training Platform Guide.
- Ubuntu 22.04 LTS OS
- Python 3.10
- Intel Gaudi accelerator
- Intel Gaudi software version 1.19.0 and above
Set up the container with latest release of Gaudi Software Suite using the Dockerfile:
$ docker build -f Dockerfile.hpu -t vllm-hpu-env .
$ docker run -it --runtime=habana -e HABANA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=all -e OMPI_MCA_btl_vader_single_copy_mechanism=none --cap-add=sys_nice --net=host --rm vllm-hpu-env
Tip
If you are facing the following error: docker: Error response from daemon: Unknown runtime specified habana.
, please refer to "Install Optional Packages" section
of Install Driver and Software and "Configure Container
Runtime" section of Docker Installation.
Make sure you have habanalabs-container-runtime
package installed and that habana
container runtime is registered.
To verify that the Intel Gaudi software was correctly installed, run the following:
$ hl-smi # verify that hl-smi is in your PATH and each Gaudi accelerator is visible
$ apt list --installed | grep habana # verify that habanalabs-firmware-tools, habanalabs-graph, habanalabs-rdma-core, habanalabs-thunk and habanalabs-container-runtime are installed
$ pip list | grep habana # verify that habana-torch-plugin, habana-torch-dataloader, habana-pyhlml and habana-media-loader are installed
$ pip list | grep neural # verify that neural-compressor is installed
Refer to System Verification and Final Tests for more details.
It is highly recommended to use the latest Docker image from Intel Gaudi vault. Refer to the Intel Gaudi documentation for more details.
Use the following commands to run a Docker image. Make sure to update the versions below as listed in the Support Matrix:
$ docker pull vault.habana.ai/gaudi-docker/1.19.0/ubuntu22.04/habanalabs/pytorch-installer-2.5.1:latest
$ docker run -it --runtime=habana -e HABANA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=all -e OMPI_MCA_btl_vader_single_copy_mechanism=none --cap-add=sys_nice --net=host --ipc=host vault.habana.ai/gaudi-docker/1.19.0/ubuntu22.04/habanalabs/pytorch-installer-2.5.1:latest
Currently, multiple ways are provided which can be used to install vLLM with Intel® Gaudi®, pick one option:
vLLM releases are being performed periodically to align with Intel® Gaudi® software releases. The stable version is released with a tag, and supports fully validated features and performance optimizations in Gaudi's vLLM-fork. To install the stable release from HabanaAI/vLLM-fork, run the following:
$ git clone https://github.com/HabanaAI/vllm-fork.git
$ cd vllm-fork
$ git checkout v0.6.4.post2+Gaudi-1.19.0
$ pip install -r requirements-hpu.txt
$ python setup.py develop
Currently, the latest features and performance optimizations are being developed in Gaudi's vLLM-fork and periodically upstreamed to vLLM main repository. To install latest HabanaAI/vLLM-fork, run the following:
$ git clone https://github.com/HabanaAI/vllm-fork.git
$ cd vllm-fork
$ git checkout habana_main
$ pip install -r requirements-hpu.txt
$ python setup.py develop
If you prefer to build and install directly from the main vLLM source, where periodically we are upstreaming new features, run the following:
$ git clone https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm.git
$ cd vllm
$ pip install -r requirements-hpu.txt
$ python setup.py develop
Feature | Description | References |
---|---|---|
Offline batched inference | Offline inference using LLM class from vLLM Python API | Quickstart Example |
Online inference via OpenAI-Compatible Server | Online inference using HTTP server that implements OpenAI Chat and Completions API | Documentation Example |
HPU autodetection | HPU users do not need to specify the target platform, it will be detected automatically upon vLLM startup | N/A |
Paged KV cache with algorithms enabled for Intel Gaudi accelerators | vLLM HPU backend contains a custom Paged Attention and cache operators implementations optimized for Gaudi devices. | N/A |
Custom Intel Gaudi operator implementations | vLLM HPU backend provides optimized implementations of operators such as prefill attention, Root Mean Square Layer Normalization, Rotary Positional Encoding. | N/A |
Tensor parallel inference (single-node multi-HPU) | vLLM HPU backend support multi-HPU inference across a single node with tensor parallelism with Ray and HCCL. | Documentation Example HCCL reference |
Inference with HPU Graphs | vLLM HPU backend uses HPU Graphs by default for optimal performance. When HPU Graphs are enabled, execution graphs will be recorded ahead of time, to be later replayed during inference, significantly reducing host overheads. | Documentation vLLM HPU backend execution modes Optimization guide |
Inference with torch.compile (experimental) | vLLM HPU backend experimentally supports inference with torch.compile. | vLLM HPU backend execution modes |
Attention with Linear Biases (ALiBi) | vLLM HPU backend supports models utilizing Attention with Linear Biases (ALiBi) such as mpt-7b. | vLLM supported models |
INC quantization | vLLM HPU backend supports FP8 model and KV cache quantization and calibration with Intel Neural Compressor (INC). | Documentation |
LoRA/MultiLoRA support | vLLM HPU backend includes support for LoRA and MultiLoRA on supported models. | Documentation Example vLLM supported models |
Multi-step scheduling support | vLLM HPU backend includes multi-step scheduling support for host overhead reduction, configurable by standard --num-scheduler-seqs parameter. |
Feature RFC |
Automatic prefix caching (experimental) | vLLM HPU backend includes automatic prefix caching (APC) support for more efficient prefills, configurable by standard --enable-prefix-caching parameter. |
Documentation Details |
Speculative decoding (experimental) | vLLM HPU backend includes experimental speculative decoding support for improving inter-token latency in some scenarios, configurabie via standard --speculative_model and --num_speculative_tokens parameters. |
Documentation Example |
- Beam search
- AWQ quantization
- Prefill chunking (mixed-batch inferencing)
The following configurations have been validated to be function with Gaudi2 devices. Configurations that are not listed may or may not work.
- meta-llama/Llama-2-7b on single HPU, or with tensor parallelism on 2x and 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-chat-hf on single HPU, or with tensor parallelism on 2x and 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B on single HPU, or with tensor parallelism on 2x and 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct on single HPU, or with tensor parallelism on 2x and 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B on single HPU, or with tensor parallelism on 2x and 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct on single HPU, or with tensor parallelism on 2x and 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Llama-2-70b with tensor parallelism on 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-chat-hf with tensor parallelism on 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B with tensor parallelism on 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct with tensor parallelism on 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B with tensor parallelism on 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct with tensor parallelism on 8x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 on single HPU or with tensor parallelism on 2x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
- mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 with tensor parallelism on 2x HPU, BF16 datatype with random or greedy sampling
Currently in vLLM for HPU we support four execution modes, depending on selected HPU PyTorch Bridge backend (via PT_HPU_LAZY_MODE
environment variable), and --enforce-eager
flag.
PT_HPU_LAZY_MODE |
enforce_eager |
Execution Mode |
---|---|---|
0 | 0 | torch.compile |
0 | 1 | PyTorch eager mode |
1 | 0 | HPU Graphs |
1 | 1 | PyTorch lazy mode |
Warning
All modes using PT_HPU_LAZY_MODE=0 are experimental and should only be used for validating functional correctness. To achieve the best performance, use HPU Graphs or PyTorch Lazy Mode. Performance improvements are planned for future releases.
Intel Gaudi accelerators perform best when operating on models with fixed tensor shapes. Intel Gaudi Graph Compiler
generates optimized binary code that implements the given model topology on Gaudi. In its default configuration, the produced binary code may be highly dependent on input and output tensor shapes, requiring graph recompilation
when encountering tensors with different shapes within the same topology. While these binaries efficiently utilize Gaudi, the compilation process itself can introduce noticeable overhead in end-to-end execution.
In dynamic inference serving scenarios, it is important to minimize the number of graph compilations and reduce the risk of graph compilation occurring during server runtime. Currently, this is achieved by
"bucketing" the model's forward pass across two dimensions: batch_size
and sequence_length
.
Note
Bucketing helps significantly reduce the number of required graphs, but it does not handle graph compilation or device code generation. These tasks are performed during the warmup and HPUGraph capture phase.
Bucketing ranges are determined with 3 parameters - min
, step
and max
. They can be set separately for prompt and decode phase, and for batch size and sequence length dimension. These parameters
can be observed in logs during vLLM startup:
INFO 08-01 21:37:59 hpu_model_runner.py:493] Prompt bucket config (min, step, max_warmup) bs:[1, 32, 4], seq:[128, 128, 1024]
INFO 08-01 21:37:59 hpu_model_runner.py:499] Generated 24 prompt buckets: [(1, 128), (1, 256), (1, 384), (1, 512), (1, 640), (1, 768), (1, 896), (1, 1024), (2, 128), (2, 256), (2, 384), (2, 512), (2, 640), (2, 768), (2, 896), (2, 1024), (4, 128), (4, 256), (4, 384), (4, 512), (4, 640), (4, 768), (4, 896), (4, 1024)]
INFO 08-01 21:37:59 hpu_model_runner.py:504] Decode bucket config (min, step, max_warmup) bs:[1, 128, 4], seq:[128, 128, 2048]
INFO 08-01 21:37:59 hpu_model_runner.py:509] Generated 48 decode buckets: [(1, 128), (1, 256), (1, 384), (1, 512), (1, 640), (1, 768), (1, 896), (1, 1024), (1, 1152), (1, 1280), (1, 1408), (1, 1536), (1, 1664), (1, 1792), (1, 1920), (1, 2048), (2, 128), (2, 256), (2, 384), (2, 512), (2, 640), (2, 768), (2, 896), (2, 1024), (2, 1152), (2, 1280), (2, 1408), (2, 1536), (2, 1664), (2, 1792), (2, 1920), (2, 2048), (4, 128), (4, 256), (4, 384), (4, 512), (4, 640), (4, 768), (4, 896), (4, 1024), (4, 1152), (4, 1280), (4, 1408), (4, 1536), (4, 1664), (4, 1792), (4, 1920), (4, 2048)]
min
determines the lowest value of the bucket. step
determines the interval between buckets, and max
determines the upper bound of the bucket. Furthermore, interval between min
and step
has special handling - min
gets multiplied by consecutive powers of two, until step
gets reached. We call this the ramp-up phase and it is used for handling lower batch sizes with minimum wastage,
while allowing larger padding on larger batch sizes.
Example with ramp-up
min = 2, step = 32, max = 64
=> ramp_up = (2, 4, 8, 16)
=> stable = (32, 64)
=> buckets = ramp_up + stable => (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64)
Example without ramp-up
min = 128, step = 128, max = 512
=> ramp_up = ()
=> stable = (128, 256, 384, 512)
=> buckets = ramp_up + stable => (128, 256, 384, 512)
In the logged scenario, 24 buckets were generated for prompt (prefill) runs, and 48 buckets for decode runs. Each bucket corresponds to a separate optimized device binary for a given model with specified tensor shapes. Whenever a batch of requests is processed, it is padded across batch and sequence length dimension to the smallest possible bucket.
Warning
If a request exceeds the maximum bucket size in any dimension, it will be processed without padding, and its processing may require a graph compilation, potentially significantly increasing end-to-end latency. The boundaries of the buckets are user-configurable via environment variables, and upper bucket boundaries can be increased to avoid such scenario.
For example, if a request with 3 sequences, each having a maximum sequence length of 412, is sent to an idle vLLM server, it will be padded and executed as a (4, 512)
prefill bucket. This is because the batch_size
(number of sequences) will be padded to 4 (the nearest batch size dimension higher than 3), and the maximum sequence length will be padded to 512 (the nearest sequence length dimension higher than 412). After the
prefill stage, it will be executed as a (4, 512)
decode bucket and will remain in this bucket until either the batch dimension changes (e.g., due to a request being completed), in which case it will become
a (2, 512)
bucket, or the context length increases beyond 512 tokens, at which point it will become a (4, 640)
bucket.
Note
Bucketing is transparent to the user – padding in the sequence length dimension is never returned, and padding in the batch dimension does not create new requests.
Warmup is an optional but highly recommended step that occurs before the vLLM server starts listening. It executes a forward pass for each bucket using dummy data. The goal is to pre-compile all graphs and avoid any graph compilation overhead within bucket boundaries during server runtime. Each warmup step is logged during vLLM startup.
This example uses the same buckets as those in the Bucketing Mechanism section. Each output line corresponds to the execution of a single bucket. When a bucket is executed for the first time, its graph is compiled and can be reused later, avoiding further graph compilations.
INFO 08-01 22:26:47 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Prompt][1/24] batch_size:4 seq_len:1024 free_mem:79.16 GiB
INFO 08-01 22:26:47 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Prompt][2/24] batch_size:4 seq_len:896 free_mem:55.43 GiB
INFO 08-01 22:26:48 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Prompt][3/24] batch_size:4 seq_len:768 free_mem:55.43 GiB
...
INFO 08-01 22:26:59 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Prompt][24/24] batch_size:1 seq_len:128 free_mem:55.43 GiB
INFO 08-01 22:27:00 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Decode][1/48] batch_size:4 seq_len:2048 free_mem:55.43 GiB
INFO 08-01 22:27:00 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Decode][2/48] batch_size:4 seq_len:1920 free_mem:55.43 GiB
INFO 08-01 22:27:01 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Decode][3/48] batch_size:4 seq_len:1792 free_mem:55.43 GiB
...
INFO 08-01 22:27:16 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Decode][47/48] batch_size:2 seq_len:128 free_mem:55.43 GiB
INFO 08-01 22:27:16 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Decode][48/48] batch_size:1 seq_len:128 free_mem:55.43 GiB
Tip
Compiling all the buckets may take some time and can be disabled by setting the VLLM_SKIP_WARMUP=true environment variable. Keep in mind that if you do this, you may encounter graph compilations when executing a given bucket for the first time. Disabling warmup is fine for development, but it is highly recommended to enable it in deployment.
HPU Graphs are currently the most performant execution method of vLLM on Intel Gaudi. When HPU Graphs are enabled, execution graphs will be traced (recorded) ahead of time (after performing warmup), to be later replayed during inference, significantly reducing host overheads. Recording can take large amounts of memory, which needs to be taken into account when allocating KV cache. Enabling HPU Graphs will impact the number of available KV cache blocks, but vLLM provides user-configurable variables to control memory management.
When HPU Graphs are used, they share the common memory pool ("usable memory") with the KV cache, as determined by the gpu_memory_utilization
flag (default value is 0.9
). Before the KV cache is allocated,
the model weights are loaded onto the device, and a forward pass of the model is executed on dummy data to estimate memory usage. Only after that, the gpu_memory_utilization
flag is applied. At its default value,
it marks 90% of the free device memory at that point as usable. Next, the KV cache is allocated, the model is warmed up, and HPU Graphs are captured. The VLLM_GRAPH_RESERVED_MEM
environment variable defines
the ratio of memory reserved for HPU Graph capture. With its default value (VLLM_GRAPH_RESERVED_MEM=0.1
), 10% of the usable memory will be reserved for graph capture (referred to as "usable graph memory"),
and the remaining 90% will be used for the KV cache. The environment variable VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_RATIO
determines the ratio of usable graph memory reserved for prefill and decode graphs. By default
(VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_RATIO=0.3
), both stages share equal memory constraints. A lower value corresponds to less usable graph memory reserved for the prefill stage. For example, setting VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_RATIO=0.2
reserves 20% of usable graph memory for prefill graphs, while 80% is allocated for decode graphs.
Note
gpu_memory_utilization
does not represent the absolute memory usage across the HPU. Instead, it specifies the memory margin after loading the model and running a profile. For example, if a device has 100 GiB of
total memory and 50 GiB of free memory after loading the model weights and executing the profiling run, the default value of gpu_memory_utilization
will mark 90% of the 50 GiB as usable, leaving 5 GiB as a margin,
regardless of the total device memory.
You can also configure the strategy for capturing HPU graphs separately for the prompt and decode stages. The strategy affects the order in which graphs are captured. Two strategies are implemented:
max_bs
- The graph capture queue is sorted in descending order by batch size. Buckets with equal batch sizes are sorted by sequence length in an ascending order (e.g.,(64, 128)
,(64, 256)
,(32, 128)
,(32, 256)
,(1, 128)
,(1,256)
), which is the default strategy for decode.min_tokens
- The graph capture queue is sorted in an ascending order by the number of tokens each graph processes (batch_size*sequence_length
), which is the default strategy for prompt.
When a large number of requests are pending, the vLLM scheduler attempts to fill the maximum batch size for decoding as quickly as possible. Once a request is finished, the decode batch size decreases.
When this happens, vLLM attempts to schedule a prefill iteration for requests in the waiting queue to restore the decode batch size to its previous state. In a fully loaded scenario, the decode
batch size is often at its maximum, making large-batch HPU graphs critical to capture, as indicated by the max_bs
strategy. Conversely, prefill iterations will typically be executed with very low
batch sizes (1-4), as reflected in the min_tokens
strategy.
Note
VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_RATIO
does not set a hard limit on the memory allocated for graphs in each stage (prefill and decode). vLLM first attempts to use the entire usable prefill graph memory
(usable graph memory * VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_RATIO) for capturing prefill HPU Graphs. It will then attempt to do the same for decode graphs and the usable decode graph memory pool. If one stage is fully
captured and there is unused memory remaining in the usable graph memory pool, vLLM will attempt to capture more graphs for the other stage, until no more HPU Graphs can be captured without exceeding
the reserved memory pool. The behavior of this mechanism is illustrated in the example below.
Each step outlined is logged by the vLLM server, with negative values indicating memory release:
INFO 08-02 17:37:44 hpu_model_runner.py:493] Prompt bucket config (min, step, max_warmup) bs:[1, 32, 4], seq:[128, 128, 1024]
INFO 08-02 17:37:44 hpu_model_runner.py:499] Generated 24 prompt buckets: [(1, 128), (1, 256), (1, 384), (1, 512), (1, 640), (1, 768), (1, 896), (1, 1024), (2, 128), (2, 256), (2, 384), (2, 512), (2, 640), (2, 768), (2, 896), (2, 1024), (4, 128), (4, 256), (4, 384), (4, 512), (4, 640), (4, 768), (4, 896), (4, 1024)]
INFO 08-02 17:37:44 hpu_model_runner.py:504] Decode bucket config (min, step, max_warmup) bs:[1, 128, 4], seq:[128, 128, 2048]
INFO 08-02 17:37:44 hpu_model_runner.py:509] Generated 48 decode buckets: [(1, 128), (1, 256), (1, 384), (1, 512), (1, 640), (1, 768), (1, 896), (1, 1024), (1, 1152), (1, 1280), (1, 1408), (1, 1536), (1, 1664), (1, 1792), (1, 1920), (1, 2048), (2, 128), (2, 256), (2, 384), (2, 512), (2, 640), (2, 768), (2, 896), (2, 1024), (2, 1152), (2, 1280), (2, 1408), (2, 1536), (2, 1664), (2, 1792), (2, 1920), (2, 2048), (4, 128), (4, 256), (4, 384), (4, 512), (4, 640), (4, 768), (4, 896), (4, 1024), (4, 1152), (4, 1280), (4, 1408), (4, 1536), (4, 1664), (4, 1792), (4, 1920), (4, 2048)]
INFO 08-02 17:37:52 hpu_model_runner.py:430] Pre-loading model weights on hpu:0 took 14.97 GiB of device memory (14.97 GiB/94.62 GiB used) and 2.95 GiB of host memory (475.2 GiB/1007 GiB used)
INFO 08-02 17:37:52 hpu_model_runner.py:438] Wrapping in HPU Graph took 0 B of device memory (14.97 GiB/94.62 GiB used) and -252 KiB of host memory (475.2 GiB/1007 GiB used)
INFO 08-02 17:37:52 hpu_model_runner.py:442] Loading model weights took in total 14.97 GiB of device memory (14.97 GiB/94.62 GiB used) and 2.95 GiB of host memory (475.2 GiB/1007 GiB used)
INFO 08-02 17:37:54 hpu_worker.py:134] Model profiling run took 504 MiB of device memory (15.46 GiB/94.62 GiB used) and 180.9 MiB of host memory (475.4 GiB/1007 GiB used)
INFO 08-02 17:37:54 hpu_worker.py:158] Free device memory: 79.16 GiB, 39.58 GiB usable (gpu_memory_utilization=0.5), 15.83 GiB reserved for HPUGraphs (VLLM_GRAPH_RESERVED_MEM=0.4), 23.75 GiB reserved for KV cache
INFO 08-02 17:37:54 hpu_executor.py:85] # HPU blocks: 1519, # CPU blocks: 0
INFO 08-02 17:37:54 hpu_worker.py:190] Initializing cache engine took 23.73 GiB of device memory (39.2 GiB/94.62 GiB used) and -1.238 MiB of host memory (475.4 GiB/1007 GiB used)
INFO 08-02 17:37:54 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Prompt][1/24] batch_size:4 seq_len:1024 free_mem:55.43 GiB
...
INFO 08-02 17:38:22 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Decode][48/48] batch_size:1 seq_len:128 free_mem:55.43 GiB
INFO 08-02 17:38:22 hpu_model_runner.py:1159] Using 15.85 GiB/55.43 GiB of free device memory for HPUGraphs, 4.755 GiB for prompt and 11.095 GiB for decode (VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_RATIO=0.3)
INFO 08-02 17:38:22 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Prompt][1/24] batch_size:1 seq_len:128 free_mem:55.43 GiB
...
INFO 08-02 17:38:26 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Prompt][11/24] batch_size:1 seq_len:896 free_mem:48.77 GiB
INFO 08-02 17:38:27 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Decode][1/48] batch_size:4 seq_len:128 free_mem:47.51 GiB
...
INFO 08-02 17:38:41 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Decode][48/48] batch_size:1 seq_len:2048 free_mem:47.35 GiB
INFO 08-02 17:38:41 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Prompt][12/24] batch_size:4 seq_len:256 free_mem:47.35 GiB
INFO 08-02 17:38:42 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Prompt][13/24] batch_size:2 seq_len:512 free_mem:45.91 GiB
INFO 08-02 17:38:42 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Prompt][14/24] batch_size:1 seq_len:1024 free_mem:44.48 GiB
INFO 08-02 17:38:43 hpu_model_runner.py:1066] [Warmup][Graph/Prompt][15/24] batch_size:2 seq_len:640 free_mem:43.03 GiB
INFO 08-02 17:38:43 hpu_model_runner.py:1128] Graph/Prompt captured:15 (62.5%) used_mem:14.03 GiB buckets:[(1, 128), (1, 256), (1, 384), (1, 512), (1, 640), (1, 768), (1, 896), (1, 1024), (2, 128), (2, 256), (2, 384), (2, 512), (2, 640), (4, 128), (4, 256)]
INFO 08-02 17:38:43 hpu_model_runner.py:1128] Graph/Decode captured:48 (100.0%) used_mem:161.9 MiB buckets:[(1, 128), (1, 256), (1, 384), (1, 512), (1, 640), (1, 768), (1, 896), (1, 1024), (1, 1152), (1, 1280), (1, 1408), (1, 1536), (1, 1664), (1, 1792), (1, 1920), (1, 2048), (2, 128), (2, 256), (2, 384), (2, 512), (2, 640), (2, 768), (2, 896), (2, 1024), (2, 1152), (2, 1280), (2, 1408), (2, 1536), (2, 1664), (2, 1792), (2, 1920), (2, 2048), (4, 128), (4, 256), (4, 384), (4, 512), (4, 640), (4, 768), (4, 896), (4, 1024), (4, 1152), (4, 1280), (4, 1408), (4, 1536), (4, 1664), (4, 1792), (4, 1920), (4, 2048)]
INFO 08-02 17:38:43 hpu_model_runner.py:1206] Warmup finished in 49 secs, allocated 14.19 GiB of device memory
INFO 08-02 17:38:43 hpu_executor.py:91] init_cache_engine took 37.92 GiB of device memory (53.39 GiB/94.62 GiB used) and 57.86 MiB of host memory (475.4 GiB/1007 GiB used)
- It is recommended to run inference on Gaudi 2 with
block_size
of 128 for BF16 data type. Using the default values (16, 32) may result in suboptimal performance due to underutilization of the Matrix Multiplication Engine (see Gaudi Architecture). - To achieve maximum throughput on Llama 7B, it is recommended to use a batch size of 128 or 256 and a maximum context length of 2048 with HPU Graphs enabled. If you experience out-of-memory issues, please refer to the Troubleshooting section below.
Diagnostic and Profiling Knobs:
VLLM_PROFILER_ENABLED
: iftrue
- enables high level profiler. Resulting JSON traces can be viewed at perfetto.habana.ai. Disabled by default.VLLM_HPU_LOG_STEP_GRAPH_COMPILATION
: iftrue
- logs graph compilations for each vLLM engine step, but only if any compilation occurs. It is highly recommended to use this in conjunction withPT_HPU_METRICS_GC_DETAILS=1
. Disabled by default.VLLM_HPU_LOG_STEP_GRAPH_COMPILATION_ALL
: iftrue
- logs graph compilations for every vLLM engine step, even if no compilation occurs. Disabled by default.VLLM_HPU_LOG_STEP_CPU_FALLBACKS
: iftrue
- logs CPU fallbacks for each vLLM engine step, but only if any fallback occurs. Disabled by default.VLLM_HPU_LOG_STEP_CPU_FALLBACKS_ALL
: iftrue
- logs CPU fallbacks for each vLLM engine step, even if no fallback occur. Disabled by default.
Performance Tuning Knobs:
VLLM_SKIP_WARMUP
: iftrue
- warmup is skipped.false
by default.VLLM_GRAPH_RESERVED_MEM
: percentage of memory dedicated for HPUGraph capture,0.1
by default.VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_RATIO
: percentage of reserved graph memory dedicated for prompt graphs,0.3
by default.VLLM_GRAPH_PROMPT_STRATEGY
: strategy determining order of prompt graph capture,min_tokens
ormax_bs
,min_tokens
by default.VLLM_GRAPH_DECODE_STRATEGY
: strategy determining order of decode graph capture,min_tokens
ormax_bs
,max_bs
by default.VLLM_{phase}_{dim}_BUCKET_{param}
- collection of 12 environment variables configuring ranges of bucketing mechanism.{phase}
is eitherPROMPT
orDECODE
{dim}
is eitherBS
,SEQ
orBLOCK
{param}
is eitherMIN
,STEP
orMAX
- Default values:
-
Prompt:
- batch size min (
VLLM_PROMPT_BS_BUCKET_MIN
):1
- batch size step (
VLLM_PROMPT_BS_BUCKET_STEP
):min(max_num_seqs, 32)
- batch size max (
VLLM_PROMPT_BS_BUCKET_MAX
):min(max_num_seqs, 64)
- sequence length min (
VLLM_PROMPT_SEQ_BUCKET_MIN
):block_size
- sequence length step (
VLLM_PROMPT_SEQ_BUCKET_STEP
):block_size
- sequence length max (
VLLM_PROMPT_SEQ_BUCKET_MAX
):max_model_len
- batch size min (
-
Decode:
- batch size min (
VLLM_DECODE_BS_BUCKET_MIN
):1
- batch size step (
VLLM_DECODE_BS_BUCKET_STEP
):min(max_num_seqs, 32)
- batch size max (
VLLM_DECODE_BS_BUCKET_MAX
):max_num_seqs
- block size min (
VLLM_DECODE_BLOCK_BUCKET_MIN
):block_size
- block size step (
VLLM_DECODE_BLOCK_BUCKET_STEP
):block_size
- block size max (
VLLM_DECODE_BLOCK_BUCKET_MAX
):max(128, (max_num_seqs*max_model_len)/block_size)
- batch size min (
-
VLLM_HANDLE_TOPK_DUPLICATES
, iftrue
- handles duplicates that are outside of top-k.false
by default.VLLM_CONFIG_HIDDEN_LAYERS
- configures how many hidden layers to run in a HPUGraph for model splitting among hidden layers when TP is 1. The default is 1. It helps improve throughput by reducing inter-token latency limitations in some models.
Additionally, there are HPU PyTorch Bridge environment variables impacting vLLM execution:
PT_HPU_LAZY_MODE
: if0
, PyTorch Eager backend for Gaudi will be used, if1
PyTorch Lazy backend for Gaudi will be used.1
is the default.PT_HPU_ENABLE_LAZY_COLLECTIVES
must be set totrue
for tensor parallel inference with HPU Graphs.
Note
Measurement files are required to run quantized models with vLLM on Gaudi accelerators. The FP8 model calibration procedure is described in the vllm-hpu-extention package.
Once you have completed the model calibration process and collected the measurements, you can run FP8 inference with vLLM using the following command:
export QUANT_CONFIG=/path/to/quant/config/inc/meta-llama-3.1-405b-instruct/maxabs_measure_g3.json
vllm serve meta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct --quantization inc --kv-cache-dtype fp8_inc --weights-load-device cpu --tensor_paralel_size 8
QUANT_CONFIG
is an environment variable that points to the measurement or quantization configuration file. The measurement configuration file is used during the calibration procedure to collect
measurements for a given model. The quantization configuration is used during inference.
Tip
If you are prototyping or testing your model with FP8, you can use the VLLM_SKIP_WARMUP=true
environment variable to disable the warmup stage, which is time-consuming.
However, disabling this feature in production environments is not recommended, as it can lead to a significant performance decrease.
Tip
When using FP8 models, you may experience timeouts caused by the long compilation time of FP8 operations. To mitigate this, set the following environment variables:
VLLM_ENGINE_ITERATION_TIMEOUT_S
- to adjust the vLLM server timeout. You can set the value in seconds, e.g., 600 equals 10 minutes.VLLM_RPC_TIMEOUT
- to adjust the RPC protocol timeout used by the OpenAI-compatible API. This value is in microseconds, e.g., 600000 equals 10 minutes.
If you encounter device out-of-memory issues or want to attempt inference with higher batch sizes, try tweaking HPU Graphs as follows:
- Tweak
gpu_memory_utilization
knob. This will decrease the allocation of KV cache, leaving some headroom for capturing graphs with larger batch size. By default,gpu_memory_utilization
is set to 0.9. It attempts to allocate ~90% of HBM left for KV cache after short profiling run. Note that this reduces the number of KV cache blocks you have available, and therefore reduces the effective maximum number of tokens handled at a given time. - If this method is not efficient, you can disable
HPUGraph
completely. With HPU Graphs disabled, you are trading latency and throughput at lower batches for potentially higher throughput on higher batches. You can do that by adding--enforce-eager
flag to the server (for online inference), or by passingenforce_eager=True
argument to LLM constructor (for offline inference).