You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the understanding that Dosbox is not cycle accurate, does anyone know how the cycle to CPU estimates in the X wiki are derived? For example, a 486-66 is estimated at 23,880 cycles, while the official (non-X) wiki has 26,800. I know the latter figure is based on SPEEDTST.COM. Is there a particular tool or set of tools being used to derive the 23,880?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
With the understanding that Dosbox is not cycle accurate, does anyone know how the cycle to CPU estimates in the X wiki are derived? For example, a 486-66 is estimated at 23,880 cycles, while the official (non-X) wiki has 26,800. I know the latter figure is based on SPEEDTST.COM. Is there a particular tool or set of tools being used to derive the 23,880?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions