Custom Icon for config GUI or a way to disable trades and sort configs name

[lerokko]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I use a lot of different configs usually only with one trade. Every few months a few random trades are enabled (by enabling the configs). Things like "This month you can get a, b, c" and next moth it will be x, y, b. I tried to be clever by giving the config (and filenames) prefixes o the all show up at the start or en of the list in the gui, but there seems to be no rhyme or reason to how they are sorted. I also have a hard time finding what configs are enabled. I have 3 permanently on. And a dozen or so that are toggled on and of monthly. With more and more being added.

Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally I would be able to disable single trades in config and not just the whole thing. this way it would slim down my list by A LOT. If that not possible I would like a way to distinguish my configs without hovering over them. Maybe custom icons i can set. It would be really great to have an enchantment glint for enabled trades/configs (or if that is too confusing maybe a stacksize of 0, I don't know if that is possible but if a stack has the size of 0 the number gets red which kinda looks like a barrier crossed out symbol. I ma just spitballin'.

Lastly but most importantly it would be great if the configs are sorted alphabetically by name.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Well, I have considered to approach this from outside and would just rename the file extension or move the configs altogether, that I do not wanna use. Bypassing the enable feature altogether. Just dropping in configs that I want to use and reload. But having dozens of configs each with a single trade, does not only sound like it wasn't supposed to that way, but also makes it impossible to guarantee to have exactly x trades from n configs. So that alternative is flawed.

Additional context
Yes, I know this is a lot of stuff in one post, but I did not want to spam. It would be really cool to see any of these features implemented, even just one would greatly reduce overhead.

Thank you in advance

[jpenilla]

#35 #36 cc40611