Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do anybody want Cloudinary as a featuredpath option to support 3rd party storage and image transformation? #98

Open
blgo opened this issue Dec 12, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@blgo
Copy link

blgo commented Dec 12, 2017

I have been working on a travel and photography blog using this theme for a few weeks now and I am using Cloudinary as a free service for domestic use and it works great.

I have mashed together some customizations which integrate display photos hosted in Cloudinary using the featuredpath front matter property and fancybox for embedding any image I want in the content markdown.

I am also using some Javascript to make the images responsive from the source if Cloudinary is your choosen "featuredpath".

All my customisations are on my github repo which hosts the website source: blgo/travel-blog

Would it be worth to tydi up my code - for this I might need a bit of help -, make Cloudinary cloud name configurable and create a branch for merging it into the theme?

@pacollins
Copy link
Collaborator

pacollins commented Dec 12, 2017

I'm not familiar with the service, so I'd have to read up. This might steer too much into the realm of bloat if it isn't a common platform. Lets see what some others say. If not we could (once we get the wiki going) explain how to implement it and leave it up to the user to make the changes (and gladly link to your repo 😄 ).

@blgo blgo changed the title Do anybody want Cloudinary as a featuredpath option? Do anybody want Cloudinary as a featuredpath option to support 3rd party storage and image transformation? Jan 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants