We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Function definitions are supposed to be like this:
function: name: sum description: ... parameters: type: object properties: a: type: number default: 0 b: ... . . ....
But currently we do not do any validation for them in typespec (code). We should use typespec's jsonschema libs to validate them.
No response
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
🔖 Feature description
Function definitions are supposed to be like this:
But currently we do not do any validation for them in typespec (code). We should use typespec's jsonschema libs to validate them.
🎤 Why is this feature needed ?
No response
✌️ How do you aim to achieve this?
No response
🔄️ Additional Information
No response
👀 Have you spent some time to check if this feature request has been raised before?
Are you willing to submit PR?
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: