-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a licence #7
Comments
Hi there
The current license wording is in the ReadMe file. Is there something else you suggest we add there to make it clearer?
Best wishes
Richard
—
Richard Mabey
CEO | juro.com
7-9 Woodbridge Street, London EC1R 0LL
Love using Juro? Leave us a review
Sent from a lawyer -- please excuse long sentences**
…--- original message ---
On May 15, 2021, 3:23 PM GMT+1 ***@***.*** wrote:
Hi @juro-privacy @korochinsky hope you are good! Is it possible to add a licence, so that the terms of reuse are a little more explicit? Thanks!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
--- end of original message ---
|
Hi Richard, Matt here 👋. Ah sorry I missed this. The usual practice is to have a dedicated |
Hey Matt! Ah got it - thanks for flagging.
Best wishes
Richard
—
Richard Mabey
CEO | juro.com
7-9 Woodbridge Street, London EC1R 0LL
Love using Juro? Leave us a review
Sent from a lawyer -- please excuse long sentences**
…--- original message ---
On May 17, 2021, 4:03 PM GMT+1 ***@***.*** wrote:
Hi Richard, Matt here 👋. Ah sorry I missed this. The usual practice is to have a dedicated LICENSE file in the root of the repository. That way github will also find it automatically.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
--- end of original message ---
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi @juro-privacy @korochinsky hope you are good! Is it possible to add a licence, so that the terms of reuse are a little more explicit? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: