Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to configure the targetPort of the interceptor-proxy service to have it listen on priviledged port 80 #1111

Open
thomasfroehle opened this issue Aug 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@thomasfroehle
Copy link

Proposal

Feature request:
Ability to configure the targetPort of the interceptor-proxy service to have it listen on port 80

Workarounds:

  1. Set the interceptor.proxy.port to 80 and run the container as root
  2. Patch the targetPort after helm install

Use-Case

I would like the interceptor proxy service to listen on port 80 to avoid the need to change existing urls. These urls are now pointing via an ExternalName-Service to the keda-interceptor-proxy

Is this a feature you are interested in implementing yourself?

Yes

Anything else?

No response

@JorTurFer
Copy link
Member

JorTurFer commented Sep 2, 2024

Hello,
I guess that we could use different values for each usage, but we need to keep the current behavior as default. I mean, if the new value isn't given, we should use the current one.
Could you open a PR with the change?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: To Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants