Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Structurized search by address #405

Open
Azbesciak opened this issue Apr 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Structurized search by address #405

Azbesciak opened this issue Apr 11, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@Azbesciak
Copy link
Contributor

Regarding to #140 and my exploring, currently there is no feature like the Nominatim provides: search by address details.
I have tried to do so with osm_tag and fields like addr:city (even changed this in code to accept values with more than one :, but maybe it is not enough) but it did not work - maybe I am looking at the wrong direction?

Nevertheless, 3 questions:

  1. is that feature in your plans/ideas?
  2. if so, are you going to implement it?
  3. if you would like to get this feature but has no time (PR accepted as I saw) how long it would take to implement it in base version without much knowledge about ES, where should I start?

Thanks in advance!

@simonpoole
Copy link
Contributor

Could you explain the use case in a bit more detail please?

In general photon will return results if you specify (partial) addresses without declaring which tags these are. The scoring is currently a bit off which at times will cause entities with numbers in their names to be returned, but for example #391 does address that issue and I would expect that PR or a modified version of it to be merged after some more review.

@Azbesciak
Copy link
Contributor Author

One may just want to be sure and give a correct specification. Form autocompletion? It is rather common...
To Say more, looking at issues like #332 or maybe #329 it would just give an alternative to the user (just better address specification) and that is what I actually need.

@Azbesciak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any response?

@Marlonzao
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants