You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What would you like to be added:
Option to put Master Nodes(cluster control-planes) inside K8s cluster that they control
Why is this needed:
For purpose of HA we need minimum 3 Masters and 3 Workers nodes. We can say that we had 2 clusters: 1 from Master nodes and 1 from Worker nodes
Negative of existing approach:
needs to manage 2 cluster
with 6 VPS/BM we achieve only FT=1
bad utilization of server power in case of BM for master nodes (in case of needs to setup private K8s from BM)
Positives of suggested approach:
manage only one cluster of VPS/BM
with the same amount of VPS/BM= 6 we achieve double FT=2
more good utilization of server power (master nodes are inside K8s)
auto healing of master component thanks to K8s specific
easy scaling of master nodes(pods)
Use cases:
Proposal is very useful when business needs private BM architecture.
Example cluster.yml:
Add new key type: default| ruler. This will allow using existing approach and suggested one. If this key value is ruler no need for key role
Option to put Master Nodes(cluster control-planes) inside K8s cluster that they control
I'm not really sure if I understand this correctly. :/ Do you mean there would be one cluster where we could run another set of control planes for other clusters? I.e. deploy all the control plane components into existing K8S cluster and expose the API out somehow?
Proposal is very useful when business needs private BM architecture.
What do you mean with the term BM?
If you do mean running possibly many control planes in some existing cluster, I'm not really sure how it fits into Pharos tooling and distribution "vision". Maybe just write a Helm chart to deploy all the needed things (etcd + api-server + controller + scheduler + ...) and expose the API via Ingress
One option might be microvm pods (like firecracker). Then we could use "normal" pharos up command for managing those control-planes if they just open a ssh port via NodePort (or similar).
What would you like to be added:
Option to put Master Nodes(cluster control-planes) inside K8s cluster that they control
Why is this needed:
For purpose of HA we need minimum 3 Masters and 3 Workers nodes. We can say that we had 2 clusters: 1 from Master nodes and 1 from Worker nodes
Negative of existing approach:
Positives of suggested approach:
Use cases:
Example cluster.yml:
type: default| ruler
. This will allow using existing approach and suggested one. If this key value isruler
no need for keyrole
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: