Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move managed cluster support (GKE) to general availability #1168

Open
salasberryfin opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Move managed cluster support (GKE) to general availability #1168

salasberryfin opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/gke Issues or PRs related to GKE kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@salasberryfin
Copy link
Contributor

/kind feature

Describe the solution you'd like

As of today, support for provisioning GKE clusters is still an experimental feature and has been for a number of months.

In recent community meetings we discussed the viability of moving GKE support out of the experimental folder and into general availability. This would allow CAPG to follow other providers, such as CAPA and CAPZ which have full support for their corresponding managed clusters: CAPA, CAPZ.

The promotion of GKE to stable could be a major step towards a more feature rich and stable CAPG, and we could push to add support for existing GKE functionalities that are still not covered by the provider (there are a few related PRs).

Since this is an important change, we thought it would be great to create this issue where we can discuss pros/cons and plan what needs to be done if we decide to go ahead.

Initially, this seems to be a non-breaking change for the API, since it means adding types but not modifying existing ones, but it would be great to have feedback from those that are more knowledgeable of the codebase.

Anything else you would like to add:

As a follow up to this, ClusterClass support for managed clusters would be one of the relevant features we could be adding, as non-managed GCP clusters can already be provisioned from a class (refer to this) and this is expected to become a powerful/distinctive functionality of CAPI.

Please, feel free to share your thoughts on this.

I will be more than happy to take on/lead this if we decide to go ahead with the change.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Mar 7, 2024
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Apr 4, 2024

@salasberryfin is looking for some feedback on this one from core maintainers
/assign @richardcase @cpanato

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 3, 2024
@salasberryfin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 4, 2024
@salasberryfin
Copy link
Contributor Author

salasberryfin commented Sep 6, 2024

Looking at unblocking this and moving the feature out of experimental.

Let's collect a list of PRs related to managed clusters that we should address:

Feel free to contribute to the list with other relevant PRs/issues.

cc: @richardcase @damdo @cpanato

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Nov 7, 2024
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/area gke

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/gke Issues or PRs related to GKE label Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/gke Issues or PRs related to GKE kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants