-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 StoragePolicy should select datastore based on connected hosts and set on VM spec #2134
🐛 StoragePolicy should select datastore based on connected hosts and set on VM spec #2134
Conversation
/hold @rikatz is testing on linked clone workflow, but otherwise ready for review. |
@randomvariable @sbueringer just confirming that the linked clone still works with this change. I will unhold, but feel free to merge it after the next minor release, as a patch if the time line needs to! :) /hold cancel |
/test help |
@chrischdi: The specified target(s) for
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-full-main |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: f0fa4d8606ab15ac9c20e42107a8a93a94228115
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
b06efe2
to
a7d4c0a
Compare
@randomvariable If you have some time, would be good if you can take a look |
/label tide/merge-method-squash |
Perfect. Thank you very much! /lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: a04ef759d82e5f997cda590c0e17c4e297ff5685
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-1.8 |
@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.8 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.7 |
@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.7 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.6 |
@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.6 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.5 |
@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.5 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@sbueringer: new pull request created: #2275 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@sbueringer: #2134 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.7":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@sbueringer: #2134 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.6":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@sbueringer: #2134 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.5":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@rikatz Do you have some time to open cherry-picks for the other branches? I diffed the branches and thought they are all pretty similar :/ |
done for the 3 failed cherry picks |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR fixes some workflows on CAPV + Storage policy:
spec.Location.Datastore = datastoreRef
otherwise the cloning process will not understand when this is a cross datastore/cluster cloning and will fail, as it will try to use the template datastore.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #