Replies: 6 comments 1 reply
-
+1 to the idea
But we can start small and then iterate |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
i think we can definitely find prior art for some of those, but i really like the direction you are thinking. making it easier for a new provider to approach the project, create their code, and ultimately share it with the wider community is a great target imo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
sounds to me like "Best Practises for Provider Development" +1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
a recent email to the sig cluster-lifecycle list was asking about office hours cadence, in response i offered my thoughts about some possible options. i'm posting it here to help stimulate some discussion and also as possible inspiration for materials we create. these are my thoughts on what i consider to be three strong options when considering setting up a community meeting.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
the topic of creating new slack channels came up in today's community meeting, this docs site has a lot of information that seems useful to this conversation. https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/contributor-cheatsheet/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
from today's community meeting, i raised the topic of repostiory owners/admins and how to add/remove, what are the minimums for good repo health, is their guidance around diversity of ownership. no solid answers, but i figured this is a good topic for this discussion as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As discussed into today's community meeting, I would like to start a conversation about adding some non-technical guidance to the Cluster API Book. The original question as posed on the meeting agenda is:
To that end, here are some issues that I am currently working through with the kubemark provider that I think would be beneficial to share with the wider community:
These are just some introductory questions that I have asked myself, or search for answers on. I think it would be great to hear what others might think, and also if this information exists already maybe we can link it in its current form rather than duplicating the effort.
There seemed to be some good support for this idea in the meeting, what other questions should we be asking? what are we missing? how can make this experience better for the next communities to create their provider implementations?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions