You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently don't have an E2E test that verifies that the watched-by label is present with the expected value kyma on the SKR KymaCR. We should either find an existing E2E test that can be extended with this, or we create an entire E2E test that is about metadata and verifies expected labels on multiple resources.
This also needs to consider that we sometimes already have such verification in E2E tests. E.g., #1913 includes a verification that managed-by label is present on all raw manifest resources and tests that those are removed once the module is unmanaged.
Ideally, we could even think about this as a "sanity check" E2E test where the checks can be re-used in the more detailed E2E tests.
Reasons
Some labels are significant to our implementations (e.g., the watched-by label). We need to make sure that those are consistent as expected.
Acceptance Criteria
watched-by label verified in E2E tests
TODO: discuss what further labels we would want to address
Feature Testing
No response
Testing approach
No response
Attachments
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
We currently don't have an E2E test that verifies that the
watched-by
label is present with the expected valuekyma
on the SKR KymaCR. We should either find an existing E2E test that can be extended with this, or we create an entire E2E test that is about metadata and verifies expected labels on multiple resources.This also needs to consider that we sometimes already have such verification in E2E tests. E.g., #1913 includes a verification that
managed-by
label is present on all raw manifest resources and tests that those are removed once the module is unmanaged.Ideally, we could even think about this as a "sanity check" E2E test where the checks can be re-used in the more detailed E2E tests.
Reasons
Some labels are significant to our implementations (e.g., the
watched-by
label). We need to make sure that those are consistent as expected.Acceptance Criteria
watched-by
label verified in E2E testsFeature Testing
No response
Testing approach
No response
Attachments
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: