Inclusion of rihibot in the ATOM repo

[Kazadhum]

Hello @miguelriemoliveira and @manuelgitgomes!

For my work on IMU data collection (see #1000), I created the rihibot simulated system, which is basically rihbot with an IMU on the end-effector. In the branch I'm using for development, I added this system directly to atom_examples.

Now, I'm basically ready to create a PR, but a question appeared in my mind. IMU calibration is not yet implemented, only data collection. With this in consideration, do you think I should include rihibot in atom_exmaples right away, with warnings in the documentation that IMU calibration is currently under development, or do you think its best if I move the system to a different repository before creating the PR?

I'm currently leaning towards the second option as it seems "cleaner" to me, but I'd like to ask your opinions.

[manuelgitgomes]

Hello!

I think the best solution is to create a branch to develop IMU calibration.
Then you can merge everything afterwards!

[Kazadhum]

Hi @manuelgitgomes! I thought about that when I created the branch I'm working on but, since IMU calibration means also adding the support for IMUs all across the ATOM pipeline, I thought it would result in a very large PR, which I'd like to avoid...

So I thought maybe it would be best if I split it in two, with the first one being just for implementing IMU data collection as well as continuous data collection... Perhaps I exclude rihibot from a first PR and only add it later on?