Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
They shouldn't |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I'm a maintainer of another package that still supports Python 2. I'm starting to run into issues where CI and testing packages are starting to remove Python 2 support. I think Python 2 packages days are numbered. It will be increasingly difficulty to maintain support. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I would drop support for upcoming versions. If somebody needs Lark for a project in Python2, an older version can be used. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It seems that general Python 2 use is at around 6% : jetbrains.com/lp/python-developers-survey-2020
Should we just drop support for it in Lark?
It would make the code-base cleaner and easier to maintain, and we could use the new features.
Is anyone here still using Python 2?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions