You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Gene strand can be very useful to detect prophages, but it is currently lacking from the .gb files. Because of that, there's no way to benchmark a tool that leverages strandness using proteins/ORFs extracted from this dataset's .gb files (using genbank2sequences.py, for example).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for the late response here, I've only just had some time to revisit this project. The strand information is available in genbank files.
5' to 3' gene:
gene 9762..10592
3' to 5' gene:
gene complement(9762..10592)
The programs that run from the genome FASTA-format files generally create their own annotations and will have strand info available (and if not it's their own fault).
Gene strand can be very useful to detect prophages, but it is currently lacking from the
.gb
files. Because of that, there's no way to benchmark a tool that leverages strandness using proteins/ORFs extracted from this dataset's.gb
files (usinggenbank2sequences.py
, for example).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: