-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Container connection delayed due to s6-rc: fatal: unable to take locks: Resource busy in v1.0.20210914-ls126 #290
Comments
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid. |
There is a PR upstream to fix this: NetworkConfiguration/openresolv#23 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
I have the same issue:
|
You don't, your issue is
|
Yeah sry I overlooked that. But I still get the error |
You will, it's an upstream bug with resolvconf that doesn't play nicely with containers, but it doesn't cause any issues other than the messages. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
I have the same issue with last version (arm) |
This issue still exist on Ubuntu 20.04 lts. I tested the non docker wireguard version and the config wg0.conf work fine. However when mount and run on docker environment the issue appear the same as previous user encounter. As side note, my mullavad vpn provider recommends to |
Closing this thread due to the irrelevant If you're getting the message |
Is there an existing issue for this?
Current Behavior
Updated Wireguard container today and getting the above message in the container logs on startup.
I have a script which checks the IP before other containers depending on wireguard startup - those which have network_mode set to service:wireguard
It showed the VPN IP on first check wasn't present, the script then shutdown the depending containers.
By the time I could exec into the wireguard container itself and check the IP by hand it had connected to the expected VPN IP.
I rolled back the WG container to these two versions to check, and these don't show this error in the container logs on startup, and don't have a delay in getting the VPN IP.
v1.0.20210914-ls124
v1.0.20210914-ls125
Expected Behavior
No delay in the container connecting on startup
Steps To Reproduce
Create container with this version
v1.0.20210914-ls126
Environment
CPU architecture
x86-64
Docker creation
Container logs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: